Re: [racket-dev] bug in ~r

2013-01-13 Thread Curtis Dutton
Thanks for fixing it! On Jan 13, 2013 3:55 PM, "Ryan Culpepper" wrote: > I just pushed a fix. Thanks for reporting this! > > Ryan > > > On 01/13/2013 10:48 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > >> It's still broken. Although I don't get an error with the latest >> sources (v5.3.2.1), the output is not right

Re: [racket-dev] bug in ~r

2013-01-13 Thread Ryan Culpepper
I just pushed a fix. Thanks for reporting this! Ryan On 01/13/2013 10:48 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: It's still broken. Although I don't get an error with the latest sources (v5.3.2.1), the output is not right: > (~r (/ 15625 16384) #:min-width 4 #:precision 1) " 0.1" > (~r (/ 15625 16384)

Re: [racket-dev] bug in ~r

2013-01-13 Thread Matthew Flatt
It's still broken. Although I don't get an error with the latest sources (v5.3.2.1), the output is not right: > (~r (/ 15625 16384) #:min-width 4 #:precision 1) " 0.1" > (~r (/ 15625 16384)) "0.953674" At Sun, 13 Jan 2013 10:40:04 -0500, Curtis Dutton wrote: > I think this is a bug... > > (~

[racket-dev] bug in ~r

2013-01-13 Thread Curtis Dutton
I think this is a bug... (~r (/ 15625 16384) #:min-width 4 #:precision 1) gives me make-string: contract violation expected: exact-nonnegative-integer? given: -1 argument position: 1st other arguments...: #\0 Can anyone else reproduce this? If so

Re: [racket-dev] racket/date, SRFI-19, date construction

2013-01-13 Thread Marco Maggi
Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > iauCal2jd gives 240.5 +56305.0 (=2456305.5) which is > the correct answer (of course!) Yes, thanks (I still have 2012 in my fingers). I fixed this in the repository. -- Marco Maggi _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.or

Re: [racket-dev] Bug in bug reporting

2013-01-13 Thread Matthew Flatt
I've pushed repairs for the bug-report bug (which was a `raco pkg show' bug). Thanks for the report! At Sun, 13 Jan 2013 12:55:34 +0100, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > Hello, > > with 5.3.2.1 on windows 8, trying to use the bug reporting form, > causes an internal error, with the following message:

Re: [racket-dev] racket/date, SRFI-19, date construction

2013-01-13 Thread Pierpaolo Bernardi
iauCal2jd gives 240.5 +56305.0 (=2456305.5) which is the correct answer (of course!) 2013/1/13, Marco Maggi : > Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: >> You may want to look instead at (the time related parts >> of) SOFA (www.iausofa.org). > > I have libtoolised SOFA: > >

Re: [racket-dev] racket/date, SRFI-19, date construction

2013-01-13 Thread Marco Maggi
Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > You may want to look instead at (the time related parts > of) SOFA (www.iausofa.org). I have libtoolised SOFA: but the single test file I have included fai