Trying to use prop:match-expander but it doesn't seem to be available:
http://pre.racket-lang.org/docs/html/reference/match.html?q=prop%3Amatch-expander#%28def._%28%28lib._racket%2Fmatch..rkt%29._prop~3amatch-expander%29%29
Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.3.1.3 [3m].
Language: racket [custom].
> (
On 01/21/2013 10:25 PM, Curtis Dutton wrote:
I've been using racket now for about 4 years now. I use it for
everything that I can and I love it. It is really an awesome system, and
I just can't say "THANKS" enough to all of you for racket.
That being said, I'd like to become more active with the
I've been using racket now for about 4 years now. I use it for everything
that I can and I love it. It is really an awesome system, and I just can't
say "THANKS" enough to all of you for racket.
That being said, I'd like to become more active with the development
process. In a past life, I worked
On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:46 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> Checklist items for the v5.3.2 release
> (using the v5.3.1.900 release candidate build)
>
> Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
> item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
> com
On 2013-01-17 13:57:51 -0500, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> The release announcement sketch that I have so far is below. Please
> mail me new items and/or edits.
* Typed Racket now supports Racket's delimited continuation
and continuation mark operators.
* The generics library now allows the s
Jay, hello.
On 2013 Jan 21, at 16:12, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I don't understand your concern.
>
> The response structure, which is the only actual structure (everything
> else is an interface on it)...
>
> a) Allows #f as the mime type
...but the documentation doesn't say what #f means here.
I don't understand your concern.
The response structure, which is the only actual structure (everything
else is an interface on it)...
a) Allows #f as the mime type
b) Has you provide an 'output' function that does the output. If you
don't want there to be any output, then don't write any:
(resp
I'll push this change shortly.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:18 PM, David Vanderson
wrote:
> Tiny request - could we add:
>
>
>
> to the of the default web-server index.html page?
>
> I started toying with serve/servlet, and was caught for a bit by:
> - first using #:servlet-path "/foo", seeing my
Sorry, an addendum...
On 2013 Jan 21, at 12:23, Norman Gray wrote:
> In the web server, the documentation for RESPONSE and, by implication,
> RESPONSE/FULL does not explain how to avoid including a message-body in the
> response, as is required for 1xx, 204, 304 statuses (and those alone).
>
Greetings.
In the web server, the documentation for RESPONSE and, by implication,
RESPONSE/FULL does not explain how to avoid including a message-body in the
response, as is required for 1xx, 204, 304 statuses (and those alone).
By experiment, giving RESPONSE/FULL a 'body' argument of #"" prod
Hello,
the file attached causes the following internal error:
C:\Program
Files\Racket-Full-5.3.2.1\collects\typed-racket\utils\tc-utils.rkt:154:0:
Internal Typechecker Error: bad expected: #(struct:tc-results
(#(struct:tc-result Char - -) #(struct:tc-result (Vector Integer Integer
Integer Integer
11 matches
Mail list logo
