[racket-dev] attacks on the plt web server?

2013-01-22 Thread Danny Yoo
I've noticed that one of my plt servers is being hit hard occassionally, with the following output coming out of the Racket web server before it crashes. I'm including a portion of the output. This is on Racket 5.3. Can it be that somehow something is escaping the custodian cleanup? dyoo@web4 ~

Re: [racket-dev] [racket] When does 3D syntax get marshalled?

2013-01-22 Thread Ryan Culpepper
Your explanation sounds correct, but 3D syntax is not encouraged and not supported. I think the fix is to change your macro to avoid 3D syntax. It's a little awkward due to the lack of let-for-syntax (and splicing-let-for-syntax, I guess), but how about the following (not tested): (define-synt

Re: [racket-dev] [racket] When does 3D syntax get marshalled?

2013-01-22 Thread J. Ian Johnson
[Moving to dev] The problem is with the implementation of splicing-syntax-parameterize, which turns the parameterization of p to #,new-tr into a TOP LEVEL define-syntax, which does NOT expand away, leading to this borkage. This calls for an mflatt. -Ian - Original Message - From: "J. Ian

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v5.3.2

2013-01-22 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
I've now implemented (attached) a (short) patch for the tree for this, which I'm happy to commit, but we should make `pkg.racket-lang.org` work first. Sam On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > Matches to 'raco pkg', which seems good to me. > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:09 PM,

Re: [racket-dev] 5.3.2 & mac os x

2013-01-22 Thread Danny Yoo
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > Dear all: we have a new .dmg layout setup for the mac os x version of Racket > and so if you have time to have a look and see if it looks reasonable on > your machine and report back here, that would be helpful. > > Here is a pointer to the

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.3.2

2013-01-22 Thread Stephen Bloch
On Jan 21, 2013, at 10:24 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > Hi Steve: You're one of the last few to complete your checklist items > (below). Do you think you'll have time to do that tomorrow or the next day? > Or perhaps is there anything we (the release managers (cc'd)) can do to help? picturing-pr

Re: [racket-dev] Performance Lab

2013-01-22 Thread Matthias Felleisen
Hi Curtis, thanks for the offer. Setting up a performance test framework would be fantastic. We may not be ready right now, but I am sure that if someone builds it, they will come. -- Matthias On Jan 22, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Curtis Dutton wrote: > I've been using racket now for about 4 year

Re: [racket-dev] Performance Lab

2013-01-22 Thread Greg Hendershott
[Disclaimer: I'm not part of the core team, nor do I play one on TV.] A few miscellaneous thoughts: 1. I love the idea of performance regression testing, with history charts. (I read a great example of this a few months ago, but can't dredge it up right now.) 2. I've wanted to do this on some of

Re: [racket-dev] Documentation lacuna?

2013-01-22 Thread Norman Gray
Jay, hello. On 2013 Jan 22, at 14:24, Jay McCarthy wrote: > I've pushed this change: The example makes it very clear, and is more direct than what I wrote. I did notice "then @racket[mime] is add as a", which should be "added", but I think my inner copy-editor needs a holiday All the be

Re: [racket-dev] Documentation lacuna?

2013-01-22 Thread Jay McCarthy
I've pushed this change: http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/commitdiff/d071dc43873b7e84a59e3c9df47a6c8b3f7c6b1d?hp=7b33298b6654bcd55105e24e99545b98db3206ba Jay On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Norman Gray wrote: > > Jay, hello. > > On 2013 Jan 21, at 16:12, Jay McCarthy wrote: > >> I don't underst

Re: [racket-dev] Performance Lab

2013-01-22 Thread Eli Barzilay
A few minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: > It would be fantastic to have this kind of help. Thank you for > offering! As Neil said, you'll want to consult with Jay some to > avoid duplication of work, but also Eli can help with sending out > notifications when pushes to the repo happen. We don't ha

Re: [racket-dev] Performance Lab

2013-01-22 Thread Robby Findler
It would be fantastic to have this kind of help. Thank you for offering! As Neil said, you'll want to consult with Jay some to avoid duplication of work, but also Eli can help with sending out notifications when pushes to the repo happen. Performance testing is a place where I think our automated

Re: [racket-dev] prop:match-expander not provided?

2013-01-22 Thread Matthew Flatt
It seems to be exported at phase 1: Welcome to Racket v5.3.2.2. > (begin-for-syntax prop:match-expander) > I'll fix the docs. At Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:14:23 -0500, Stephen Chang wrote: > Trying to use prop:match-expander but it doesn't seem to be available: > > http://pre.racket-lang.org/docs/