On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Why do you think it should include so much stuff? I would have said it
> should include only the directories where we know that collections live.
Can those other directories are also potential places where
collections could be installed? If
I've run the tests that use the lexer, and it appears to pass. But
since it's parser-tools/lex, I'd like a second opinion on this, just
in case I'm doing something very silly.
I've put this in my branch 'pr13471':
https://github.com/dyoo/racket/tree/pr13471
After someone takes a look and sa
Why do you think it should include so much stuff? I would have said it
should include only the directories where we know that collections live.
Robby
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
> > 6.2 in the planet2 docs suggest s
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> 6.2 in the planet2 docs suggest something more complicated. Probably we want
> to follow that?
>
> But this idea seems to fit better to me!
I think it should include, at the very least, (find-lib-dir),
(find-user-lib-dir), (find-collects-dir)
6.2 in the planet2 docs suggest something more complicated. Probably we
want to follow that?
But this idea seems to fit better to me!
Robby
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
> > The change to DrRacket that you suggest wo
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> The change to DrRacket that you suggest would have the effect of debugging
> annotations being forgotten for files that are already compiled by another
> route, so that seems wrong.
Ok, so I'll revert that particular change on my fork.
But
On Feb 3, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> I think the syntax was
> ...
> like function headers
Now wouldn't it be nice if we had class initialization work exactly like
function calls.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On 2013-02-03 10:50:31 -0500, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> (inst c% 1 2 3)
> (inst c% #:x 1 #:y 2)
> (inst c% 1 2 #:z 3)
> ;; not sure what to do about the last one
Also if you want to play with this, I implemented something like this
once:
https://github.com/takikawa/racket/tree/kw-init
I think
Thanks Pierpaulo I see it now.
Cheers,
Harry
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
> I meant 'Tack/Untack arrows'.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> 2013/2/3, Harry Spier :
> > Thanks Pierpaolo,
> > I don't see a command to highlight the variable, though I do see jump to
> > next bound occura
I meant 'Tack/Untack arrows'.
Cheers
2013/2/3, Harry Spier :
> Thanks Pierpaolo,
> I don't see a command to highlight the variable, though I do see jump to
> next bound occurance and the very useful "change variable name"
> Harry
>
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi
> wrote:
>
Thanks Pierpaolo,
I don't see a command to highlight the variable, though I do see jump to
next bound occurance and the very useful "change variable name"
Harry
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
> You can already do this by right-clicking an identifier and selecting
> the
Isn't this what git head does with the yellow coloring? -- Matthias
On Feb 3, 2013, at 1:46 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
> You can already do this by right-clicking an identifier and selecting
> the appropriate command (whose name at the moment I can't remember).
>
> Cheers
>
>
> 2013/2/3,
I wouldn't worry too much about make-object and instantiate since they
exist essentially only for backwards compatibility.
Robby
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-02-03 10:50:31 -0500, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> > How about
> >
> > (inst c% 1 2 3)
> > (inst c%
(inst c% 1 #:z 3 2) would work for the last, I'm pretty sure.
Robby
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> On 2013-02-01 3:29 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> > (new c% 1 2 3) => (instantiate c% (1 2 3))
> > (new c% [x 1] [y 2]) => (instantiate c% [x 1] [y 2])
> > (n
On 2013-02-03 10:50:31 -0500, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> How about
>
> (inst c% 1 2 3)
> (inst c% #:x 1 #:y 2)
> (inst c% 1 2 #:z 3)
> ;; not sure what to do about the last one
I considered something like this, where the keyword's symbolic name is
just used for the corresponding init arg (so it's
On 2013-02-01 3:29 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> (new c% 1 2 3) => (instantiate c% (1 2 3))
> (new c% [x 1] [y 2]) => (instantiate c% [x 1] [y 2])
> (new c% [z 3] 1 2) => (instantiate c% (1 2) [z 3])
> (new c% 1 [z 3] 2) => (instantiate c% (1 2) [z 3])
How about
(inst c% 1 2 3)
(i
If not too complicated, would it be possible to include a .desktop file in
the Ubuntu installers?
It's not necessary per se, but it would be useful.
A file like drracket-.desktop, to be placed in either
/usr/share/applications for a system-wide installation or in
~/.local/share/applications otherw
17 matches
Mail list logo
