Re: [racket-dev] Instantiation syntax of `new`

2013-02-03 Thread Robby Findler
I wouldn't worry too much about make-object and instantiate since they exist essentially only for backwards compatibility. Robby On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: On 2013-02-03 10:50:31 -0500, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote: How about (inst c% 1 2 3)

Re: [racket-dev] Feature request:highlight variables

2013-02-03 Thread Matthias Felleisen
Isn't this what git head does with the yellow coloring? -- Matthias On Feb 3, 2013, at 1:46 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: You can already do this by right-clicking an identifier and selecting the appropriate command (whose name at the moment I can't remember). Cheers 2013/2/3, Harry

Re: [racket-dev] Feature request:highlight variables

2013-02-03 Thread Harry Spier
Thanks Pierpaolo, I don't see a command to highlight the variable, though I do see jump to next bound occurance and the very useful change variable name Harry On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi olopie...@gmail.comwrote: You can already do this by right-clicking an identifier

Re: [racket-dev] Instantiation syntax of `new`

2013-02-03 Thread Asumu Takikawa
On 2013-02-03 10:50:31 -0500, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote: (inst c% 1 2 3) (inst c% #:x 1 #:y 2) (inst c% 1 2 #:z 3) ;; not sure what to do about the last one Also if you want to play with this, I implemented something like this once: https://github.com/takikawa/racket/tree/kw-init I think

Re: [racket-dev] Running in DrRacket changes behavior of the `compiler/cm` library

2013-02-03 Thread Danny Yoo
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote: Why do you think it should include so much stuff? I would have said it should include only the directories where we know that collections live. Can those other directories are also potential places where