Re: [racket-dev] Fix for PR13305 displays oddly in Opera

2013-02-18 Thread Danny Yoo
Ok, I'm reverting most of what I did here for PR 13305, but I do introduce a change in the sequence:   where the discretionary word breaks are supposed to happen: the   is what I've adding. The extra   entity is bizarre, but I've seen it recommended elsewhere on the web when wbr is being si

Re: [racket-dev] extflonum unboxing, f80vector ffi

2013-02-18 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:37:22 +0400, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > 1. Minor issue: broken contract does not check for some > reason related to the unboxing machinery: > > (require racket/extflonum) > > (define (a b) >(extfl+ b 1.0)) > > (a 1.0t0) > > Should raise "extfl+: contract violation", but s

Re: [racket-dev] extflonum unboxing, f80vector ffi

2013-02-18 Thread Dmitry Pavlov
Mathew, Thank you so much for merging Michael's patch and fixing the shuffling of the unboxed arguments. Now it all works fine for us, including the FFI support (_longdouble, f80vector). Michael is now working on the following: 1. Minor issue: broken contract does not check for some reason rela

[racket-dev] Build error on i586

2013-02-18 Thread Евгений Ростовцев
I can't build racket on i586 platform. Build log: http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/90195/build/100/i586/log Can somebody help me? -- REAL aka Евгений Ростовцев, программист ЦНИТ КемГУ ALT Linux team _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev