On 4/17/13 10:36 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* David Van Horn
- EoPL Tests
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Yes, Whalesong's running ok on it.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Checklist items for the v5.3.4 release
(using the v5.3.3.900 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
commits that should have been picked, make sure that the changes ar
At Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:22:02 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:15:03 -0500, Brian Mastenbrook wrote:
> > On 04/08/2013 03:58 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > > I've pushed changes to the JIT to add an ARM back-end, which is based
> > > on Paulo César Pereira de Andrade's very nice imp
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:25:02 +0200, Matthew Flatt
wrote:
That matches my observations. Files accessed via collection always keep
their
paths 'as is'. But it is enough to start a program via racket
instead of
racket -l what/ever to break this.
I should have mentioned that you could use `rac
At Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:19:58 +0200, Tobias Hammer wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:39:22 +0200, Matthew Flatt
> wrote:
> > For module paths, "same file" involves only syntactic normalizations of
> > the pathname (e.g., no checking for soft links). Various pieces of the
> > system are carefully im
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:39:22 +0200, Matthew Flatt
wrote:
Yes, I think Racket should use PWD --- if the expansion of soft links
produces the same path as getcwd(), which seems to be what "/bin/pwd"
does.
That check is even better than the one i had in mind. That should prevent
any
possibl
Matthew Flatt wrote at 04/17/2013 10:39 AM:
It would be great if we could normalize every path
to a canonical form, but path normalization in general seems to
intractable due to the possibilities of soft links, hard links,
multiple mount points, case-sensitivity choices, and probably other
twists
Yes, I think Racket should use PWD --- if the expansion of soft links
produces the same path as getcwd(), which seems to be what "/bin/pwd"
does.
Should Racket also set PWD (optionally, but by default) when it creates
a subprocess? I think probably so.
To make sure we're all on the same page:
T
Hi,
i am currently implementing an application that heavily relies on rackets
great serialize functionality to exchange data between racket processes on
different computers. That works well until i stumbled over a very
confusion behavior of rackets filesystem and module path resolution.
I
10 matches
Mail list logo