Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26996: master branch updated

2013-06-20 Thread Neil Toronto
Should I do the same kind of thing with "math/tests" and "plot/tests"? In general, should everything have a separate tests package? On 06/19/2013 07:53 PM, ro...@racket-lang.org wrote: robby has updated `master' from f7a344dc32 to 9df3aa6a94. http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/f7a344dc32..9df3aa

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26989: master branch updated

2013-06-20 Thread Eli Barzilay
An hour and a half ago, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > [...] (Sorry, I meant it to just be informative, not to argue a point... I should have written a conclusion that it's fine to not redo the reorganization commit.) > > pkgs/gui-pkgs/gui-lib/mred/installer.rkt > > pkgs/gui-pkgs/gui-lib/racket/

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26989: master branch updated

2013-06-20 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:58:04 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > Yesterday, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > > > [...] some script that finds the recent rename of all files and make > > sure that it produces an expected result. > > Suspicious undetected renames (excluding info files, git files, etc): > > pkgs

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26989: master branch updated

2013-06-20 Thread Eli Barzilay
Yesterday, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > [...] some script that finds the recent rename of all files and make > sure that it produces an expected result. Suspicious undetected renames (excluding info files, git files, etc): pkgs/drracket/drracket/acks.rkt pkgs/drracket/drracket/drracket.extreg p