At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 02:54:06 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On 07/13/13 20:56, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> [...]
> > ** Downloading release installers from PLT
> >
> > The "www.racket-lang.org" site's big blue button will provide the same
> > installers that it does now, at least by defa
Documentation hyperlinks are now covered by the package-dependency
checking of `raco setup'.
Dependencies that take the form of `for-label' imports were found by
normal module-dependency checking, already. The new checks cover cases
where a document refers to another document via `other-doc' or
`@
Thanks! (For one, I found the "From Back There to Here" section
particularly helpful.)
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Here's a big-picture update of where we are in the new package system
> and the conversion of the Racket distribution to use packages.
>
> This message
> At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 02:54:06 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> > On 07/13/13 20:56, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > [...]
> > > ** Downloading release installers from PLT
> > >
> > > The "www.racket-lang.org" site's big blue button will provide the same
> > > installers that it does now, at
First, thanks for the very informative update.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> [Guess:] The "Racket" and "Minimal Racket" distributions might point
> to different pre-built package catalogs. Possibly, the "Racket"
> catalog never updates packages that were included in the
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:02:28 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> First, thanks for the very informative update.
>
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > [Guess:] The "Racket" and "Minimal Racket" distributions might point
> > to different pre-built package catalogs. Possibly,
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:02:28 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
> But when you run `raco pkg install' or `raco pkg update', then the
> package details are not necessarily determined by
> "pkg.racket-lang.org". The package might be downloaded
At Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:55:20 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
> >
> > This slowdown seems to be real on my machine as well --
> > realm/chapter2/source.rkt runs more than twice as slow in rev bd09a60e
> > as it does in v5.3.5. I'm
See below
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 14, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> First, thanks for the very informative update.
>
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>> [Guess:] The "Racket" and "Minimal Racket" distributions might point
>> to different pre-built pac
> On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 07:00:14 -0600, Matthew Flatt
> said:
>> At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 02:54:06 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
>> > On 07/13/13 20:56, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>> > [...] > > ** Downloading release installers from PLT
>> > >
>> > > The "www.racke
On 07/14/13 15:00, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 02:54:06 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On 07/13/13 20:56, Matthew Flatt wrote:
[...]
** Downloading release installers from PLT
The "www.racket-lang.org" site's big blue button will provide the same
installers that it d
As one of those people on the periphery, wanted to share some
feedback. I hope it's not so high-level that it's vague and annoying.
1. Racket has a wonderful story about simple installation.
On Windows, Mac, Linux, you download one file, run it, and it's all
set up and good to go in < 1 minute. (
12 matches
Mail list logo
