> * Jon Rafkind
> Release tests for (one of the) linux releases:
> - Test that the `racket' and `racket-textual' source releases
> compile fine (note that they're still called `plt' and `mz' at
> this stage).
> - Test that the binary installers for both work, try each one in
> b
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>
> * Robby Findler
> - DrRacket Tests
> - Framework Tests
> - Contracts Tests
> - Games Tests
> - Teachpacks Tests: image tests
> - PLaneT Tests
> - Redex Tests
> Updates:
> - DrRacket Updates: update HISTORY
> - Redex U
The build completes successfully now. Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I'm seeing that in a fresh build. (Didn't see it before, because I had
> mangled my build.)
>
> I'll push a repair shortly.
>
> At Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:14:49 -0400, Stephen Chang wrote:
>> When co
At Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:13:28 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>
> Checklist items for the v5.3.6 release
>(using the v5.3.5.900 release candidate build)
>
> Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
> item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Carl Eastlund
> - Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
>
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
I'm seeing that in a fresh build. (Didn't see it before, because I had
mangled my build.)
I'll push a repair shortly.
At Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:14:49 -0400, Stephen Chang wrote:
> When compiling a fresh git head clone, I still get some cross-phase
> persistence errors (see below). Is this my fault,
I get the same thing. Also, the error message is particularly unhelpful.
It does not give the name of the module, a source location, or any
indication of what part of the module did not match what part of the
grammar in what way. This is pretty much impossible to debug without
searching for every
When compiling a fresh git head clone, I still get some cross-phase
persistence errors (see below). Is this my fault, or are some packages
still missing the declaration?
raco setup: --- checking package dependencies ---
raco setup:
raco setup: error: during making for
/errortrace-doc/errortrace/s
At Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:13:28 -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Matthew Flatt
>- Racket Tests
>- Languages Tests
>- GRacket Tests (Also check that `gracket -z' and `gracket-text' still
> works in Windows and Mac OS X)
>- mzc --exe tests
>- .plt-packing Tests
>- Games Tes
At Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:48:14 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
> However one thing is missing, the man pages are not installed by the make
> install phase. For openSUSE (yet it should be the same for other distros)
> every executable file should have a man page.
I've updated "info.rkt" fil
Checklist items for the v5.3.6 release
(using the v5.3.5.900 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
commits that should have been picked, make sure that the changes ar
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:32:10 -0600, Matthew Flatt
> said:
Matthew> When the "gui" (or "gui-lib") package is installed, then a
Matthew> "gracket" executable is added to "bin". The "starter" executable
Matthew> is used by `raco exe' to generate executables (that sometime
As of v5.90.0.2 (pending), to declare a cross-phase persistent module,
the module body must include
(#%declare #:cross-phase-persistent)
If the module declaration fails to meet the syntactic and import
constraints of a cross-phase persistent module, then a syntax error is
reported.
This change
13 matches
Mail list logo
