The release process for v6.0.2 will begin in about a week. If
you have any new features that you want in and are relatively close
to being done, now is a good time to do that.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On Jul 2, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Loop syntax and sugar is fine. And having "#:continue" and "#:break"
> keywords at the top of the form is sufficient warning of surprises ahead,
> IMHO.
>
> I do have a minor ongoing concern that people coming from other languages
> lately l
Loop syntax and sugar is fine. And having "#:continue" and "#:break"
keywords at the top of the form is sufficient warning of surprises
ahead, IMHO.
I do have a minor ongoing concern that people coming from other
languages lately latch onto the "for" family of forms from the start,
don't get
Interestingly enough, I tried to explain this idea to the Imperative Advanced
Placement crowd in the 1990s. With functional programming -- control from
tail-recursive functions -- is more expressive than programming with limited
loops because you can (1) break/resume/continue/foobar your 'loops
4 matches
Mail list logo