Does `identifier-binding` not give you the symbol that you need?
At Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:32:46 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
Ok, I thought I had figured this out, but I was wrong.
Here's what I want to be able to do:
- take an identifier in a fully-expanded source file
- translate
Ah, now I know what I was doing wrong. I was using identifier-binding for
references, but not for definitions. Now that I'm using it in both places,
things seem to work.
Thanks!
Sam
On Jul 17, 2014 3:08 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Does `identifier-binding` not give you the
Hi all,
I was wondering what people think about a potential API addition to the
`syntax/flatten-begin` library.
Something like `flatten-begin*` (or a less terrible name) that would
recursively flatten `begin` expressions like the `flatten` function does
for plain lists.
i.e.,
(flatten-begin*
Why doesn't flatten-begin already do this?
Robby
On Friday, July 18, 2014, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering what people think about a potential API addition to the
`syntax/flatten-begin` library.
Something like `flatten-begin*` (or a less terrible name) that
4 matches
Mail list logo
