Re: [racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-29 Thread Eli Barzilay
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt >> wrote: >>> >>> All the history for the code has been preserved, and for code that >>> dates back before 2005, the history

Re: [racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-29 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > wrote: >> >> All the history for the code has been preserved, and for code that >> dates back before 2005, the history is extended back to the original >> CVS repository. See https://gith

Re: [racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-29 Thread Eli Barzilay
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > > All the history for the code has been preserved, and for code that > dates back before 2005, the history is extended back to the original > CVS repository. See https://github.com/racket/games/ for an example of > this. There's a fail

[racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-29 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
As Matthias mentioned in his email a few days ago, we're in the process of splitting the repository so that it doesn't bundle together so many packages. I've started this process already, and a number of packages have already been split out. For most people, this won't have a big impact, but I'll o