Super! Thank you.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:21:51 -0700, Byron Davies wrote:
> > Your code, commented:
> >
> > (define orig-i (current-inspector)) ; saves the original inspector
> > (define sub-i (make-insp
?
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:36:18 -0700
From: Matthew Flatt
To: Byron Davies
Cc: dev@racket-lang.org
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] Full transparency
Message-ID: <20150122123620.2daa1650...@mail-svr1.cs.utah.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I don't think you want to do anything with th
. Why don't you
> create a fork and experiment?
>
>
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Byron Davies
> wrote:
>
> > Or, more conservatively, every struct and object in a given package,
> file, or set of files.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Byron Davi
Or, more conservatively, every struct and object in a given package, file,
or set of files.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Byron Davies
wrote:
> Would it be easy to create a compiler flag that would make every struct
> and object transparent? This would then make it easy to create
Would it be easy to create a compiler flag that would make every struct and
object transparent? This would then make it easy to create a Lisp
Machine-style Inspector that would be able to roam through every data
structure during debugging.
Byron
_
Racket Developers list:
I’m putting large s-expressions as properties on syntax objects. When I
display them in the right pane of the syntax browser, they go way off the side
of the pane. I’d like to be able to pretty-print the values of properties.
I can’t figure out how to insert pretty-print into the property disp
6 matches
Mail list logo
