On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:55:59PM -0500, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> If you are interested in helping, please reply to this message to
> the mailing list and include the configuration(s) you are willing
> to test.
OK, of what seems to be remaining...
I can do the Windows 32-bit, if it is acceptable
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:55:59PM -0500, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> We would like to test the release candidate on the following
> configurations:
If I find the time to help here, where would I get the official "release
candidate"? Sorry if this should be obvious.
David
_
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:28:46AM -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> But how well does it work to use
>
> bin/raco pkg install -i --auto main-distribution
>
> at the end of the commands above?
>
> Use `raco pkg install` pulls packages from the network, instead of from
Hmm, I think that will not wo
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 10:48:39PM -0600, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> http://drdr.racket-lang.org/27688/pkgs/rackunit-pkgs/rackunit-test/tests/rackunit/run-tests.rkt
>
> One thing that you will see is that as part of testing there are some
> failing tests to see what happens, but the tests deliberately
What is the correct way to run the tests which test rackunit?
I am running the following after building with a clean tree:
$ racket/bin/raco test pkgs/rackunit-pkgs/rackunit-test/tests/rackunit
This seems to show several "failures", though since it is testing rackunit
I'm pretty sure most if no
Are terms defined via @deftech in the Racket reference supposed to be
accessible via @tech from the Racket guide?
In pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/evts.scrbl there
exists a line that looks like:
... @deftech{synchronizable event} ...
In my pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-doc/scribb
Thank you to everyone who provided feedback on my Guide chapter on
concurrency. I think I've addressed everyone's suggestions in my latest
version [1].
My question at this point is whether to rebase before submitting a pull
request. If the initial commit had not been made public I would
obviousl
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:42:56AM -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> You can use things like @interaction[] to run and typeset examples; does
> that help?
>
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/scribble/eval.html?q=interaction#%28form._%28%28lib._scribble%2Feval..rkt%29._interaction%29%29
That's not exactly
I am building from a (relatively recent) git checkout. I have been
using the in-place make target which installs in ./racket, but I'd like
to have everything built and installed in a separate BUILD directory.
My motivations are to have a single directory to rm -r when I want to
start over and seco
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 04:08:27PM -0400, David Vanderson wrote:
> This is fantastic! Thank you! I learned a good deal reading it
> just now. Comments below:
Great! Thanks for checking it out and commenting.
> make-arithmetic-thread is missing a "(let loop ()" line. Later in
> the same examp
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:21:26PM -0700, John Clements wrote:
> Isn't this early example:
>
> +@racketblock[
> +(define worker (thread (lambda ()
> + (let loop ()
> + (displayln "Working...")
> + (loop)
> +(sle
Hi all,
At the hackathon Asumu helped me work on a Guide chapter on concurrency.
Thanks Asumu!
Since then I've fleshed it out some more and pushed a commit to github.
https://github.com/davidtpierson/racket/commit/d2fb857efec8ce508ac6f76afa845d788edab4c1
It probably needs more work. I would
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:39:54PM -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> Recently I (with assistance from Asumu) have spent some time drafting
> a revised home page for Racket. A revised web page will nicely
> complement the big upcoming release, I hope. You can see the draft
> here, which is ready
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 03:48:17PM -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> With the trend of having shorter names, I'll try suggesting it again.
> Looking at some random slides (the ones from Matthew's talk), one
> thing that is -- still -- very strikingly inconvenient is code like
>
> (parameterize ([curr
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:44:35AM -0400, David T. Pierson wrote:
> (Presumably if equally concise names that better reflected function
> signatures were available, they would have been used in the first
> place.)
Sorry for the double post. I should have added "equally lucid"
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 06:23:16PM -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> The naming consistency is good, but they aren't really consistent at
> the signature or functionality level:
>
> string->number produces #f when called on "hello world" or "\0"
> string->path fails on "\0"
> string->url succ
Hi all,
Graphic design is not a strength of mine, but I had an idea that I
don't think I've seen incorporated into any of the designs so far.
Maybe someone will want to take it further.
http://i.imgur.com/ExgM6.png
A couple of points:
My original idea was simply an italicized R and a λ. Then I
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:02:46AM -0800, Pauan wrote:
> JavaScript you can saythis: /\\\d/ But before we can even consider
> such a syntax, we first need to add in theabove mentioned regexp
> syntaxes. Because otherwise #px/\n/ would compile into(pregexp "\\n")
> which would then throw an error,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:02:46AM -0800, Pauan wrote:
> Yes that is exactly it. The rationale is as ozzloy said: right now you
> needto use something like #px"\\d" to match the string "\\5".
> That's a lot ofbackslashes!
> In other languages that support regexps, there's usually a way of
> spe
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:35:57PM -0800, Pauan wrote:
> It was brought up that my explanation was confusing, and I agree it is.
> So I'll try again. The following should return #t:
...
> (regexp-match? "\\n" "\n")
I am confused about a number of things in your emails, so for simplicity
I'm
Hi all,
I'm hoping that non-developers [of Racket itself] are welcome to post
here.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:59:25AM -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> Here's a proposal:
> `integer?' becomes the same as `exact-integer?' (which is kept for
> backwards compatibility).
It is not clear to me from t
21 matches
Mail list logo
