Re: [racket-dev] Downloading DrRacket for Mac is hard?

are fat binaries out of the question? -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Racket DMG improvements

-os-x-using-command-line-tools [2]: http://svn.dmdirc.com/trunk/installer/osx/makeInstallerOSX.sh [3]: https://github.com/planetbeing/libdmg-hfsplus -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org

Re: [racket-dev] overwrite

is not the case, at least for me). I do not use network mounts or git and I too get this message almost all the time on OS X. I will try to track it down using the patches posted in this thread. -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _ For li

Re: [racket-dev] polling select in racket

so suggest checking out Racket light-weight threads. You can then use blocking calls. -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Strage 5.0.99.5 segfault

On 29.12.10 12:14, Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote: On 29.12.10 02:32, Matthew Flatt wrote: Thanks for the report! As it happens, I think I fixed this a few minutes ago: http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/commit/3b032893c1b9f74b04d0803ecd0f20c1d101dd11 Just to make sure before trying a new version, you

Re: [racket-dev] Strage 5.0.99.5 segfault

disable the JIT (e.g., with "-j"). Probably this is it, since it manifested in one other place where I mistakenly returned multiple values. I will let you know after I compile the new version. -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _ For li

[racket-dev] Strage 5.0.99.5 segfault

n apply_k () #32 0x00074536 in scheme_top_level_do_worker () #33 0x00074778 in scheme_top_level_do () #34 0x35f0 in finish_cmd_line_run () #35 0x458a in main_after_stack () #36 0xc0a3 in scheme_main_stack_setup () #37 0x2b46 in main () -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _

Re: [racket-dev] Cursor color in 4.0.99.4 on dark backgrounds

That was quick (as always). :) Thank you very much. -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Cursor color in 4.0.99.4 on dark backgrounds

ing pretty quickly in that area, so you probably should upgrade.) To be completely honest I have a custom compilation from github sources which calls itself 5.0.99.4--2010-12-06 -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _ For list-related administrative ta

[racket-dev] Cursor color in 4.0.99.4 on dark backgrounds

I believe that the cursor color logic changed in the new Racket GUI. In the 4.0.99.4 it is black regardless of the background which is especially hard on an (almost) black background. -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _ For list-related

Re: [racket-dev] enter! verbosity

On 10.12.10 21:05, Noel Welsh wrote: It is moderately useful to see what is reloaded if you renter enter! Just a quick thought: Let it output what it is "reloading" and not what is loaded for the first time. OTOH does enter! really do any reloading? -- regards, Jakub P

Re: [racket-dev] full tree text search

ther useless files. It needs a config file entry for Racket though (.ackrc): --type-set racket=.rkt,.scrbl,.ss,.scm Usage: ack foo -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Hacking on the collects

documentation as well? [1]: https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/3 Direct link to the diff: https://github.com/jpc/racket/commit/45441054bc0dbd8ad6fc05f2ae2eb135830a9b02 -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

[racket-dev] Hacking on the collects

e and then endure the "raco setup" once for final testing? Thanks for any suggestions. -- regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev