On Nov 25, 2014 11:01 AM, "Matthew Flatt" wrote:
> We can't link to "libreadline" by default in a Racket
> distribution, and since "libeditline" isn't typically included with
> Linux distributions (as far as I can tell), it seems like we haven't
> solved any problem unless we provide "libeditline"
.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/racket.git;a=blob;f=debian/fetch-snapshot.sh;hb=HEAD
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
-snapshot.sh;hb=HEAD
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On Dec 13, 2012 9:22 AM, "Chen Xiao" wrote:
>
> I fork the codebase on my local computer. Then I .configure & make & make
install, as a result, there are many compiled things like bin or *.o files.
>
> To avoid add them to my commit, I modify .gitignore to ignore them all.
Add your local ignores
hould this commit be merged to stable?
That commit is in 5.3.1 already:
$ git tag --contains 1e375bab
v5.3.1
The build failure you saw was for 5.3, and there was a subsequent upload
with a patch to that affect applied.
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy
__
below.)
Thanks. I made a similar change to Debian's package for our 5.3 upload
to resolve the bug on our end. I also added a note to our NEWS file
mentioning the future removal upstream and "raco planet" as the
replacement.
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McC
}
4005 start += info->size;
4006 }
because info->size is 0. This is while processing the first page from
gc->gen1_pages.
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
ar signedness but
doesn't explicitly declare the sign for char, like a lot of the code
base does.
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
ed on past experience, I think that, if a Debian package
> maintainer is trying to package Racket, and they see that there is
> already a "scribble" executable, they will rename Racket's
> "scribble" executable to something else, like "racket-scribble"
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> * A new XREPL collection provides convenient commands for uses of
> plain racket.
Is that supposed to be "commands for users"?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-0
10 matches
Mail list logo
