Re: [racket-dev] Racket compiler in Racket

2015-02-17 Thread Leif Andersen
Hello, I am working on porting the racket compiler to racket. But it still has a bit to go and I have not yet ported the optimizer. So go right ahead. Thank you. ~Leif Andersen On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Gustavo Massaccesi wrote: > There is project to rewrite the Racket compiler

Re: [racket-dev] Line editing in the default REPL

2014-12-28 Thread Leif Andersen
reasonable to me, I've never heard this anywhere else. Also, it would completely negate the FSFs reason for releasing libreadline under the gpl. (Since libedit and libreadline share the same bindings, you can almost always use them interchangeably.) I'm thinking we should ask this on the

Re: [racket-dev] Line editing in the default REPL

2014-12-13 Thread Leif Andersen
is here: https://github.com/LeifAndersen/readline I'm thinking we could distribute the editline collection with Racket (treating libedit the same way we currently treat other native packages such as libcairo). And then we can make xrepl default. Would this be doable? ~Leif Andersen On Wed

Re: [racket-dev] Line editing in the default REPL

2014-12-03 Thread Leif Andersen
eifAndersen/racket-line-editor/blob/master/main.rkt > Then you need to deal with the trickyness of a proper editor, with features like blinking a matching paren... While these features are cool, they are things that can be added on later (by extending the line editor I linked to above). ~Leif And

Re: [racket-dev] Line editing in the default REPL

2014-11-25 Thread Leif Andersen
endency issue anyway. [1]: https://github.com/antirez/linenoise ~Leif Andersen On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Matthew Flatt > wrote: > >> Do you h

[racket-dev] Line editing in the default REPL

2014-11-24 Thread Leif Andersen
keep `(require readline)` as before, maintaining backwards compatibility. If we do do this, this leads to the question of distribution. Would we want to include libedit inside Racket distributions, or should we just link to whatever the user has on their system? ~Leif Andersen ___

Re: [racket-dev] [racket] Performance. Higher-order function

2014-08-12 Thread Leif Andersen
> but my guess is that that will require some work internally to make not be a pain for people who want to build from git Wouldn't this be the ideal case for git submodules? ~Leif Andersen On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > I think you'd have to add a d

Re: [racket-dev] pkg account creator not working?

2014-07-21 Thread Leif Andersen
What web browser are you using? I was only able to make an account using Chromium. (Firefox didn't work for me.) ~Leif Andersen On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:27 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote: > I tried to make an account of pkgs.racket-lang.org, and it never emailed me a > code. Is somet