I vote for this change too.
I've been letting my planet packages sit in planet for too long now.
This change provides a bit nicer upgrade path. :)
Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu writes:
I vote for this change.
I'm happy to change my packages (which make more sense as
single-collection
Is this related to the enter bug?
$ racket
Welcome to Racket v5.3.2.3.
(enter! slideshow/pict)
define-values: assignment disallowed;
cannot re-define a constant
constant: invoke-unit/core
in module: /home/michael/local/racket/collects/racket/unit.rkt
context...:
I love this idea, since it also (at least impliticly) demonstrates how
to work with Racket's GUI layer, which could also be useful to new users.
Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu writes:
We had a freshman two years back who implemented an ftp server. I think he
(and others like him)
Agreed.
I wonder if we couldn't find a way to mirror the distinction between
(define x ...) and (define (x) ...) somehow, combining the functionality
of match-define and define/match. After all, we don't have define-var
and define-fun, right?
(match/define (list x y z) '(1 2 3))
x -- 1
For the record, I've always just defined my own modulo when I need it
for floats:
; A modulo operator for floats!
(define (float-modulo p q)
(- p (* q (truncate (/ p q)
It doesn't properly handle negative numbers though.
David Van Horn dvanh...@ccs.neu.edu writes:
On 9/14/12 3:36 PM,
I just noticed something about the way I use search.
Just now, I wanted to find the reference docs that describe threads. So
I typed thread into the search box and got documentation about the
(thread ...) form, in both the old and new search pages.
But the reference describes Threads, not
6 matches
Mail list logo
