On Mar 6, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Um, no, I don't think that this is similar.
Okay.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 20 minutes ago, mikel evins wrote:
>>
>> Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and
>> more apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and
>> source files are somehow mutu
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Stephen Bloch wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:54 AM, mikel evins wrote:
>
>> Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and more
>> apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and source files
&g
On Mar 6, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Marijn wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Mikel,
>
> On 06-03-13 04:05, mikel evins wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Eli Barzilay
>> wrote:
>>> But looking at it more deeply
On Mar 5, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 10 minutes ago, mikel evins wrote:
>>
>> But not having the capability to save and load an image provides no
>> advantages. Anything you can do without that capability, you can do
>> with it. The reverse is not
On Mar 5, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Ray Racine wrote:
> Larceny (a Scheme) supports images. I had another dance with them awhile
> back playing around with Gilad Bracha's Newspeak. I hear the Dart folks have
> debated support for platform independent images of Dart programs to be served
> out for e
On Mar 5, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> A few minutes ago, mikel evins wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:55 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>
>>> An hour and a half ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have empathy for your p
On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:55 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> An hour and a half ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>
>> I have empathy for your perspective, because I have worked with
>> images and -- at the time -- found them useful.
>
> I think that *most* of Mikel's long post was about the advantages of
On Mar 5, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> I have empathy for your perspective, because I have worked with images and --
> at the time -- found them useful.
>
> I will also say that in my own experience of developing a tiny sliver of this
> code base, it is much more like a con
On Mar 4, 2013, at 9:48 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Mar 4, 2013, at 10:35 AM, mikel evins wrote:
>
>> Besides the practical reasons I already gave, I also think that there's been
>> a gradual trend away from image-based development over the last twenty
On Mar 4, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> Hi Mikel,
>
> You projects sounds very interesting.
>
> 2013/3/4 mikel evins :
>> Oh, except for the case where I want to deploy on iOS, which forbids JIT.
>>
>> Of course, Racket doesn't deliver o
On Mar 4, 2013, at 9:56 AM, mikel evins wrote:
>
> On Mar 4, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
>> At Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:35:42 -0600, mikel evins wrote:
>>> The reason I ask is that MacScheme made it easy to have most of an app
>>> compiled to byt
On Mar 4, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:35:42 -0600, mikel evins wrote:
>> The reason I ask is that MacScheme made it easy to have most of an app
>> compiled to bytecode, which was very compact and reasonably efficient, but
>>
On Mar 4, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Mon, 04 Mar 2013 08:50:19 -0600, mikel evins wrote:
>> Is the bytecode format platform-independent?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Is it documented? I guess I probably won't need to know gory details
>> about the by
On Mar 4, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 02 Mar 2013 08:44:38 -0600, mikel evins wrote:
>> I'm working on a Lisp. Recently I've been tinkering with an implementation
>> in
>> Racket. Racket makes it impressively easy to write.
>>
I'm working on a Lisp. Recently I've been tinkering with an implementation in
Racket. Racket makes it impressively easy to write.
I need it ultimately to be an old-fashioned kernel+image Lisp, with a
platform-specific kernel executable and a platform-independent heap image.
I'm aware that's no
16 matches
Mail list logo
