On 2013-09-16 16:17:33 -0400, as...@racket-lang.org wrote:
> +@defmodule[math #:no-declare #:link-target? #f]
> +@defmodule[plot/typed #:no-declare #:link-target? #f]
These two lines cause `raco setup` to complain with a warning about
undeclared dependencies. It seems silly, though, to have the TR
Can that code not be moved into the relevant packages instead?
Robby
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-09-16 16:17:33 -0400, as...@racket-lang.org wrote:
> > +@defmodule[math #:no-declare #:link-target? #f]
> > +@defmodule[plot/typed #:no-declare #:link-target? #
Perhaps some macro hackery on the defmodule form to make it into
defmodule-if-exists and only document that the module is typed if it is
actually installed?
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-09-16 16:17:33 -0400, as...@racket-lang.org wrote:
> > +@d
I think what Carl suggested is preferable -- a link that only exists
if the package it links to exists. Alternatively, a link that goes to
the web if the package doesn't exist yet. I think the latter is
planned but not yet implemented, from my recollection.
Sam
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:41 PM,
It's implemented, but it's not currently an option for `defmodule`.
I'll look into adding the option.
At Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:49:27 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> I think what Carl suggested is preferable -- a link that only exists
> if the package it links to exists. Alternatively, a link th
I think the Typed Racket docs should have pointers to how to use other
libraries in a typed fashion -- it's a question that comes up a lot.
Sam
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Can that code not be moved into the relevant packages instead?
>
> Robby
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2
So you want scribble to generate a link that can, when clicked (or maybe
when the docs are built) turn into the real link or turn into "please
install package X"?
Robby
On Monday, September 16, 2013, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> I think the Typed Racket docs should have pointers to how to use ot
FWIW, this seems to have broken the snapshot builds. I'll add the missing
dependency declarations so I can restart the northwestern snapshots.
Also FWIW:
WARNING: collected information for key multiple times:
'(exporting-libraries #f); values: '(typed/srfi/14) '(typed/rackunit)
WARNING: collected
On Sep 17, 2013 4:38 AM, "Robby Findler"
wrote:
>
> FWIW, this seems to have broken the snapshot builds. I'll add the missing
dependency declarations so I can restart the northwestern snapshots.
Is this a situation where we can make the builds more robust? Presumably
this issue wouldn't have prev
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2013 4:38 AM, "Robby Findler"
> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, this seems to have broken the snapshot builds. I'll add the
> missing dependency declarations so I can restart the northwestern snapshots.
>
> Is this a situation where
At Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:03:30 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sep 17, 2013 4:38 AM, "Robby Findler"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > FWIW, this seems to have broken the snapshot builds. I'll add the
> > missing dependency declarations
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sep 17, 2013 4:38 AM, "Robby Findler"
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > FWIW, this seems to have broken the snapshot builds. I'll add the
>> > missing dependency declarations
On 2013-09-17 06:15:42 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Yes, please treat missing package dependencies the same as any other
> build error. Mistakes will happen, but they should be corrected as soon
> as possible, even if it requires a stop-gap solution.
Whoops, sorry for breaking the snapshots. I th
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> In this particular case, if `raco setup` hadn't reported failure, the
> builds might have hobbled along; I'm not sure. The snapshot build
> generally relies on dependencies being accurate, and I don't think it's
> worth thinking hard about
At Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:31:26 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> >
> > In this particular case, if `raco setup` hadn't reported failure, the
> > builds might have hobbled along; I'm not sure. The snapshot build
> > generally relies on depende
No problem. It was easy to tweak and re-run (and one lost day is not a big
deal either).
Robby
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-09-17 06:15:42 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > Yes, please treat missing package dependencies the same as any other
> > build error. M
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:31:26 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Matthew Flatt
> wrote:
> > >
> > > In this particular case, if `raco setup` hadn't reported failure, the
> > > builds might have hobbled alo
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
>>
>> Also FWIW:
>>
>> WARNING: collected information for key multiple times:
>> '(exporting-libraries #f); values: '(typed/srfi/14) '(typed/rackunit)
>> WARNING: collected information for key multiple times:
>> '(exporting-libraries #f);
18 matches
Mail list logo
