No need to apologize! I'd feel lost if you didn't ask questions that
forced me to explain things better. :)
Do you think it's worthwhile to make it easy for people to get the old
behavior?
Neil ⊥
On 04/04/2014 11:28 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
Oh, I finally understand.
Yes, I agree that this
Oh, I finally understand.
Yes, I agree that this is a good change.
Sorry for the confusion.
Robby
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> Yes, the relative size of the font will grow, as well as minor things,
> such as that the lines will thicken a bit. IOW, without the fix, i
Yes, the relative size of the font will grow, as well as minor things,
such as that the lines will thicken a bit. IOW, without the fix, if you
output the same plot to a PDF, SVG, and PNG, the PDF will have a smaller
font and thinner lines than the SVG and PNG.
It can be hard to tell without co
I'm not completely clear on the precise impact of old papers: will the plot
itself stay the same size, but the relative size of the font (to the other
plot elements) inside the plot change only? Or something else?
Robby
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> I did it because I w
I did it because I was tired of putting (plot-font-size 15) at the top
of every program that produced a plot for a paper. Also, I think it was
bad for the "preview" in DrRacket to look different from the PDFs. (Some
of my plots in DrRacket had legends that badly overlapped the data in
order to
Is efc46de backwards compatible? (I worry about breaking people's papers,
specifically.)
Robby
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:20 AM, wrote:
> ntoronto has updated `master' from 87cfce97f9 to efc46ded6d.
> http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/87cfce97f9..efc46ded6d
>
> =[ 2 Commits ]
6 matches
Mail list logo
