Sounds fine.
At Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:20:54 -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
>
> If we take it out of editor<%>, we should not encounter any problems
> whatsoever. It is possible that additional implements-interface checks will
> succeed, but I am doubtful. Other than that I can't think of any
If we take it out of editor<%>, we should not encounter any problems
whatsoever. It is possible that additional implements-interface checks will
succeed, but I am doubtful. Other than that I can't think of any problems.
Should Asumu try and just run the whole test suite and if it works you co
I think the mismatch was not intentional.
Maybe `do-copy' originally had a consistent interface, or maybe it was
written down in `editor<%>' before it became apparent that its
interface would be be specific to each different kin of editor. I can't
think of any reason to have `do-copy' in its prese
Hi all,
While writing contracts for classes in racket/gui, I noticed that the
implementations of text% and pasteboard% do not act as behavioral
subtypes of editor<%>, which both classes implement.
In particular, consider the do-copy method from editor<%>. Its contract
looks like this:
(send an-e
4 matches
Mail list logo
