+1. I started using dynamic-require for the first time over the past
few weeks, and was quite bewildered at first. It took me a while to
figure out that all I needed was a symbol, and I don't understand the
other options yet. I mentioned this separately to Matthew already,
because he was helping
I will second the idea behind this request. (I thought I had to use
dynamic-require's second argument in the summer, and after studying it for
quite a while, i was happy to figure out a way around it.)
On Sep 14, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> I just tried to figure out what the se
I just tried to figure out what the second argument of dynamic-require does
when it's not a symbol, for the nth time. First of all, the current
interface -- 0, #false, and (void) as tokens for three rather arbitrary
modes of operation -- leaves much to be desired. These other modes should
probabl
3 matches
Mail list logo
