On 20/02, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I've pushed a repair. The problem was a JIT change related to the order
> of unboxed flonums on temporary space. The bug didn't always appear
> because the problem was only on the slow path (as triggered by a
> thread-scheduling interrupt, for example).
>
> Thanks!
I've pushed a repair. The problem was a JIT change related to the order
of unboxed flonums on temporary space. The bug didn't always appear
because the problem was only on the slow path (as triggered by a
thread-scheduling interrupt, for example).
Thanks!
At Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:54:02 +0100, Phili
On 19/02, Robby Findler wrote:
> I'm seeing it too. Unfortunately not reproducibly, so I haven't tried a git
> bisect. It would be nice to try, tho.
>
> Robby
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
>
> > On 2013-02-19 19:19:24 +0100, Philippe Mechaï wrote:
> > >I've
I'm seeing it too. Unfortunately not reproducibly, so I haven't tried a git
bisect. It would be nice to try, tho.
Robby
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-02-19 19:19:24 +0100, Philippe Mechaï wrote:
> >I've just compiled latest Racket version and found out i
On 2013-02-19 19:19:24 +0100, Philippe Mechaï wrote:
>I've just compiled latest Racket version and found out icons are not
>displayed correctly as shown in attached screenshot.
>Please tell me if I can be of any help to diagnose this problem.
FWIW, I've had this problem too on a 64-bit
Hi,
I've just compiled latest Racket version and found out icons are not
displayed correctly as shown in attached screenshot.
Please tell me if I can be of any help to diagnose this problem.
Regards,
Philippe
<>_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/de
6 matches
Mail list logo
