Okay, I've extended the readtable.
At-exp is preferable, and I do use at-exps in other circumstances.
Thank you, Greg.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Greg Hendershott
wrote:
> Well, I think Ryan is talking about people who are coding a new
> feature that's nearly ready. Not soliciting ideas for
Well, I think Ryan is talking about people who are coding a new
feature that's nearly ready. Not soliciting ideas for last-minute
ideas to try to rush into v6. Nice try, though. :)
Having said that, have you tried using at-exps for this?
I've only thought about this for a few minutes, and there a
Could you please make the regular expression syntax more elegant?
To replace the "" with // or any other character as its boundary.
Here is the example:
#px/^\s*\/([^\/])\/\s*$/ === #px@^\s*/([^/])/\s*$@ ===
#px"^\\s*/([^/])/\\s*$"
Thank you in advance.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Ryan Cul
The release process for v6.0 will begin in about a week. If
you have any new features that you want in and are relatively close
to being done, now is a good time to do that.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
4 matches
Mail list logo
