It wasn't that I forgot to implement pieces, after all. The problem was
a bug in the byte compiler's handling of `#%variable-reference` when
inlining. I've pushed a repair.
At Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:24:56 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> It's supposed to be safe; the behavior in this example is definite
It's supposed to be safe; the behavior in this example is definitely a
bug.
The `#%variable-reference` form used to work only on top-level and
module variables. It seems that I forgot to fill in some pieces when I
made `#%variable-reference` work on local bindings (several years ago,
mainly for us
I'm not sure if #%variable-reference is supposed to be unsafe or not
(it's not mentioned in the documentation), but it looks like an
attempt to get the location of an identifier that is neither top-level
nor module-level results in a hard crash:
===
#lang racket/base
(define (go)
(define foo 3)
aha! That fixed it. Thanks.
On Thu Jan 08 2015 at 6:18:12 AM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Do you have the latest "images-doc" and/or "gui-lib" packages?
>
> Recently, there was a problem with the "images" documentation where it
> tried to use `racket/gui` at document-build time. At the same time,
> th
Do you have the latest "images-doc" and/or "gui-lib" packages?
Recently, there was a problem with the "images" documentation where it
tried to use `racket/gui` at document-build time. At the same time,
there was also a problem in `racket/gui` that could cause a crash
(mainly on Mac OS X) after `ra
Hey all,
When I try to run `make` on the current head the build segfaults while
making the documentation. The last few lines of the output are:
raco setup: 2 rendering:
/pfds/pfds/scribblings/functional-data-structures.scrbl
raco setup: 1 rendering:
/future-visualizer/future-visualizer/scribbling
Thanks for the report! This information looks consistent with a bug
that I recently fixed in the development version, and I've recommended
a back-ported repair to be included in v5.3.6.
At Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:31:13 +0700 (NOVT), "oev" wrote:
> It seems like the problem is kind of described at
> ht
It seems like the problem is kind of described at
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@racket-lang.org/msg18395.html
I was working long time and have got DrRacket "not responding" after 'New
Tab' click.
I use pre-release 32-bit version 5.3.5.900 on Windows 7 Professional SP1
64bit. Run DrRacket with
The latest commit d408ba4 fixes this for me.
On 02/13/2013 10:14 AM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-02-13 10:36:09 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
>>I don't know what would help, but one thing that usually does is a stack
>>trace. You can probably get it from a coredump file or by something l
On 2013-02-13 10:36:09 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
>I don't know what would help, but one thing that usually does is a stack
>trace. You can probably get it from a coredump file or by something like
>this:
>$ gdb `which racket`
> [... stuff ...]
>(gdb) set args -l setup
>
I'm trying a clean build now, and maybe the problem will be obvious.
At Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:36:09 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
> I don't know what would help, but one thing that usually does is a stack
> trace. You can probably get it from a coredump file or by something like
> this:
>
> $ gdb `wh
I don't know what would help, but one thing that usually does is a stack
trace. You can probably get it from a coredump file or by something like
this:
$ gdb `which racket`
[... stuff ...]
(gdb) set args -l setup
(gdb) run
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> Hi all,
On 2013-02-13 11:24:35 -0500, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> I get a reproducible segfault when I built Racket from git HEAD. This is
> what I see:
A git bisect seems to pinpoint the segfault to commit
4a0adb6a74630f4afc7fd85275ffca76836037b4.
Cheers,
Asumu
_
Racket Developers
Hi all,
I get a reproducible segfault when I built Racket from git HEAD. This is
what I see:
raco setup: 7 making: redex/examples (Reduction Semantics examples)
reverse: contract violation
expected: list?
given: 4193052015854236082
SIGSEGV SI_KERNEL SI_CODE 128 fault on addr (nil) sent by ke
14 matches
Mail list logo
