Re: [racket-dev] Semantics of struct-out with except-out

2014-07-15 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
ity. Sam > > Thanks, > -Ian > - Original Message - > From: "Sam Tobin-Hochstadt" > To: "J. Ian Johnson" > Cc: "dev" > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:35:01 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: Re: [racket-dev] Semantics of st

Re: [racket-dev] Semantics of struct-out with except-out

2014-07-15 Thread J. Ian Johnson
-Ian - Original Message - From: "Sam Tobin-Hochstadt" To: "J. Ian Johnson" Cc: "dev" Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:35:01 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [racket-dev] Semantics of struct-out with except-out On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:23 AM, J. I

Re: [racket-dev] Semantics of struct-out with except-out

2014-07-15 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:23 AM, J. Ian Johnson wrote: > I'm working on enhancing struct-info to carry field names as symbols to do > nice hygienic things: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2014-July/063271.html > > I now see that struct-out always provides all field accessors in the

[racket-dev] Semantics of struct-out with except-out

2014-07-15 Thread J. Ian Johnson
I'm working on enhancing struct-info to carry field names as symbols to do nice hygienic things: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2014-July/063271.html I now see that struct-out always provides all field accessors in the static struct-info associated with the struct identifier. This m