[racket-dev] What can cause Interactions disabled?

2013-10-07 Thread Neil Toronto
I have a long-running random simulation that spits out debug messages. I extrapolated that it would take 20 hours to get 5,000,000 samples, and let it run for a day. Here's what I saw when I returned: Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.90.0.9--2013-10-04(876995d5/d) [3m]. Language: typed/racket

Re: [racket-dev] What can cause Interactions disabled?

2013-10-07 Thread Robby Findler
Was it black on yellow or red? Robby On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.comwrote: I have a long-running random simulation that spits out debug messages. I extrapolated that it would take 20 hours to get 5,000,000 samples, and let it run for a day. Here's what I

Re: [racket-dev] What can cause Interactions disabled?

2013-10-07 Thread Neil Toronto
Black on yellow. On 10/07/2013 09:50 AM, Robby Findler wrote: Was it black on yellow or red? Robby On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com mailto:neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote: I have a long-running random simulation that spits out debug messages. I

Re: [racket-dev] What can cause Interactions disabled?

2013-10-07 Thread Robby Findler
Then I think that that means that the message came from rep.rkt's no-user-evaluation-message function and that you either should have gotten a dialog with an explanation for why it terminated, or you have the preference 'drracket:show-killed-dialog set to #f. I think that the only two explanations

Re: [racket-dev] What can cause Interactions disabled?

2013-10-07 Thread Neil Toronto
I have that preference set to #f, if this is what it looks like in the preferences file: (plt:framework-pref:drracket:show-killed-dialog #f) Apparently, it got set to #f when I unchecked Show this dialog next time once after I hit Ctrl-K and DrRacket warned me that I couldn't use the

Re: [racket-dev] What can cause Interactions disabled?

2013-10-07 Thread Robby Findler
Probably the check box should make finer distinctions, yes (altho the plumbing inside is the same, as it turns out). And, FWIW setting it to #t will probably only say you ran out of memory. And at the command line, you don't have drracket hogging all that memory so probably that's the best thing,