On Friday, November 8, 2013, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:18:10 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Matthew Flatt
> > >
> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. Even if (as in the future) the current ring-0 packages weren't all
> > > the same git repository, I'd certain
At Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:18:10 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> > Yes. Even if (as in the future) the current ring-0 packages weren't all
> > the same git repository, I'd certainly at least try building them with
> > this change.
> >
> > I think
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Yes. Even if (as in the future) the current ring-0 packages weren't all
> the same git repository, I'd certainly at least try building them with
> this change.
>
> I think that running all the tests in the same way that DrDr does is
> not yet
Yes. Even if (as in the future) the current ring-0 packages weren't all
the same git repository, I'd certainly at least try building them with
this change.
I think that running all the tests in the same way that DrDr does is
not yet easy, but I hope we're moving in the direction of making that
eas
I agree
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> (I think it is okay.)
>
> But here's a chance for me to point out something I heard about in a
> conversation with Satnam Singh at OOPSLA about how Google works that it
> seems like would be a nice fit for us. Here's my adaptation to
(I think it is okay.)
But here's a chance for me to point out something I heard about in a
conversation with Satnam Singh at OOPSLA about how Google works that it
seems like would be a nice fit for us. Here's my adaptation to our world:
when you push out what some might consider a change that brea
6 matches
Mail list logo
