Yes: Racket needs a consistent starting point for the GC'ed stack
across calls into the Racket.
At Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:32:26 -0700, Dan Liebgold wrote:
> Is there any reason the scheme_main_setup trampoline can't be done later in
> the program (i.e. only at the point I want to invoke Racket stuff)
Is there any reason the scheme_main_setup trampoline can't be done later in
the program (i.e. only at the point I want to invoke Racket stuff)?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:10:08 -0700, Dan Liebgold wrote:
> > Does anyone have an example of embed
At Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:10:08 -0700, Dan Liebgold wrote:
> Does anyone have an example of embedding 3m Racket (5.3) in a C++ program
> without overriding main? I have a legacy C++ app that wants to eval some
> Racket code but I'd like to be minimally invasive. Might need to shell
> out...
One stra
Does anyone have an example of embedding 3m Racket (5.3) in a C++ program
without overriding main? I have a legacy C++ app that wants to eval some
Racket code but I'd like to be minimally invasive. Might need to shell
out...
--
Dan Liebgold[dan.liebg...@gmail.com]
_
4 matches
Mail list logo