Re: [racket-dev] foreign struct access different in 5.1.3?

2011-09-17 Thread Kevin Tew
I'll do that. Kevin On 09/17/2011 07:53 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: At Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:44:50 -0600, Kevin Tew wrote: If you would like document the fact that cstructs are generative only up to version 5.1.3. I think that improve the docs. I think the right next step is for you (Kevin) to upd

Re: [racket-dev] foreign struct access different in 5.1.3?

2011-09-17 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:44:50 -0600, Kevin Tew wrote: > If you would like document the fact that cstructs are generative only up > to version 5.1.3. I think that improve the docs. I think the right next step is for you (Kevin) to update "doc/release-notes/racket/HISTORY.txt" to describe the chang

Re: [racket-dev] foreign struct access different in 5.1.3?

2011-09-17 Thread Kevin Tew
On 09/16/2011 09:04 PM, John Clements wrote: On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:06 PM, John Clements wrote: I'm trying to backport working FFI code to 5.1.3, and I'm having trouble referring to elements of a C struct. Specifically, in the presence of this definition (define-cstruct _rack-audio-closure

Re: [racket-dev] foreign struct access different in 5.1.3?

2011-09-16 Thread John Clements
On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:06 PM, John Clements wrote: > I'm trying to backport working FFI code to 5.1.3, and I'm having trouble > referring to elements of a C struct. Specifically, in the presence of this > definition > > (define-cstruct _rack-audio-closure > ([sound _pointer] > [cur-s

[racket-dev] foreign struct access different in 5.1.3?

2011-09-16 Thread John Clements
I'm trying to backport working FFI code to 5.1.3, and I'm having trouble referring to elements of a C struct. Specifically, in the presence of this definition (define-cstruct _rack-audio-closure ([sound _pointer] [cur-sample_ulong] [num-samples _ulong] [stop-now _bo