I took over the ohloh page for the "racket" project. (It used to
point to a project that has been completely dead for a number of
years.) See it here:
http://www.ohloh.net/p/racket
It has some nice features like an aggregation of RSS feeds (I've added
the repository and the blog feeds) and
On Jul 5, 2011, at 7:29 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> I took over the ohloh page for the "racket" project. (It used to
> point to a project that has been completely dead for a number of
> years.) See it here:
>
>http://www.ohloh.net/p/racket
>
> It has some nice features like an aggregation o
40 minutes ago, John Clements wrote:
>
> 1) I just followed clojure's lead.
>
> https://github.com/jbclements/ohcount
Thanks!
> I've submitted a pull request. Eli, I added you as a collaborator on
> this repo in case you want to add some more sophisticated tests (I
> just copied lisp, like C
John Clements wrote at 07/06/2011 08:53 PM:
2) I see that we're "in the top 2% of all open-source projects" according to
ohloh. Perhaps we should advertise this?
Below is very opinion-heavy seat-of-pants reaction. I'm not familiar
with Ohloh, and I could be off the mark...
The Ohloh si
15 minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> Below is very opinion-heavy seat-of-pants reaction. I'm not
> familiar with Ohloh, and I could be off the mark...
>
> The Ohloh site seems oriented towards PHBs who use 'analysis' like
> "decreasing year-over-year development activity" without wondering
On Jul 6, 2011, at 7:06 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 15 minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>>
>> Below is very opinion-heavy seat-of-pants reaction. I'm not
>> familiar with Ohloh, and I could be off the mark...
>>
>> The Ohloh site seems oriented towards PHBs who use 'analysis' like
>> "decreasi
6 matches
Mail list logo
