Re: [racket-dev] possible 5.2.900.1 bug involving rest argument

2012-07-29 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Jul 28, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: andmap: contract violation expected: list? given: '(#syntax:/tmp/zzz:5:19 Y . #syntax:/tmp/zzz:5:23 Z) argument position: 2nd other arguments...: #procedure:void context...:

Re: [racket-dev] possible 5.2.900.1 bug involving rest argument

2012-07-29 Thread Ryan Culpepper
Yes, I fixed the bug. The fix should be in the release build tomorrow. Ryan On 07/28/2012 08:28 PM, Robby Findler wrote: I believe Ryan fixed this a few hours ago. He may be waiting for a release build before commenting. Robby On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org

[racket-dev] possible 5.2.900.1 bug involving rest argument

2012-07-28 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Looks like a minor compiler/optimizer bug in Friday's 5.2.900.1 pre-release. I haven't yet found a simpler test case, but you can reproduce by installing a particular PLaneT package as shown below. The line 1275 it's complaining about is the following, which starts a procedure definition

Re: [racket-dev] possible 5.2.900.1 bug involving rest argument

2012-07-28 Thread Eli Barzilay
6 hours ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote: Looks like a minor compiler/optimizer bug in Friday's 5.2.900.1 pre-release. I haven't yet found a simpler test case, but you can reproduce by installing a particular PLaneT package as shown below. The line 1275 it's complaining about is the following,

Re: [racket-dev] possible 5.2.900.1 bug involving rest argument

2012-07-28 Thread Robby Findler
I believe Ryan fixed this a few hours ago. He may be waiting for a release build before commenting. Robby On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: 6 hours ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote: Looks like a minor compiler/optimizer bug in Friday's 5.2.900.1 pre-release. I