Re: [racket-dev] request to move cfg-parser from algol60 into parser-tools

2013-01-16 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Wed, 16 Jan 2013 08:44:33 -0700, Danny Yoo wrote: Ok, done. I've also did a copy-and-paste of the documentation for parser-tools/yacc, but adjusted the prose where cfg-parser deviates from the standard parser interface. Does it look ok? Cut-and-paste worries me. Instead of copying the

Re: [racket-dev] request to move cfg-parser from algol60 into parser-tools

2013-01-16 Thread Danny Yoo
Cut-and-paste worries me. Instead of copying the documentation for X to Y, usually it works better to document X as Like Y, except Could that work in this case? Ok, I can change it so it just documents the delta. How does this look?

Re: [racket-dev] request to move cfg-parser from algol60 into parser-tools

2013-01-16 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:28:23 -0700, Danny Yoo wrote: Cut-and-paste worries me. Instead of copying the documentation for X to Y, usually it works better to document X as Like Y, except Could that work in this case? Ok, I can change it so it just documents the delta. How does this

Re: [racket-dev] request to move cfg-parser from algol60 into parser-tools

2013-01-04 Thread Matthew Flatt
Yes, I agree. At Thu, 3 Jan 2013 22:45:14 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: Sounds great to me! Robby On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Danny Yoo d...@hashcollision.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote: Is the documentation and