On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Rodolfo Carvalho wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
>> Just now, Justin Zamora wrote:
>> > The search still doesn't find words in function descriptions.
>>
>> [It's not a full-text search, and as long as it's required to run on
>> cl
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Just now, Justin Zamora wrote:
> > The search still doesn't find words in function descriptions.
>
> [It's not a full-text search, and as long as it's required to run on
> client machines (needed to run on your local copy), it's unlikely to
About two weeks ago, Michael Wilber wrote:
> I just noticed something about the way I use search.
>
> Just now, I wanted to find the reference docs that describe
> threads. So I typed "thread" into the search box and got
> documentation about the (thread ...) form, in both the old and new
> search
About two weeks ago, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>
> A quick note: I searched for "Scribble" and didn't get the main
> manual. The reason is that is named:
>
> "Scribble: The Racket Documentation Tool in scribble"
>
> This case could be solved by renaming it:
> "Scribble - The Racket Doc
About two weeks ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > Three hours ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> >> Getting away from the discussion on sorting speed, I don't think
> >> my suggestion even requires sorting: just add a 1.5 for
> >> match-all-
I just noticed something about the way I use search.
Just now, I wanted to find the reference docs that describe threads. So
I typed "thread" into the search box and got documentation about the
(thread ...) form, in both the old and new search pages.
But the reference describes "Threads", not "th
On May 29, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Three hours ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>> Just now, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
I think you probably want to rank/divide '1' here based on how
much of the identifier is matc
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Three hours ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> > Just now, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> >> I think you probably want to rank/divide '1' here based on how
>> >> much of the identifier i
Three hours ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > Just now, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> >> I think you probably want to rank/divide '1' here based on how
> >> much of the identifier is matched by the search. For example, if
> >> you search for
Four hours ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> A few minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> > Eli Barzilay wrote at 05/29/2012 07:17 AM:
> > > I have made a possibly useful improvement to the JS search code.
> > > It's not pushed, yet, but I dropped the revised JS code on the
> > > pre-built pages so you can t
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 20 minutes ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> An hour and a half ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> >
>> > To stop the sort in the middle, use a custom comparison function,
>> > a bit of state, and an exception.
>>
>> This might work.
>
> I was conf
On May 29, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 20 minutes ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> An hour and a half ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>>
>>> To stop the sort in the middle, use a custom comparison function,
>>> a bit of state, and an exception.
>>
>> This might work.
>
> I was confuse
20 minutes ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> An hour and a half ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> >
> > To stop the sort in the middle, use a custom comparison function,
> > a bit of state, and an exception.
>
> This might work.
I was confused. It does work, but it's not enough to be able to throw
an
On May 29, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Justin Zamora wrote:
> This is especially frustrating since the very first exercise in HTDP 1e is
> to use the search to find out whether DrRacket has a sine function.
(It is okay for students to guess that sometimes they may have to search for a
slightly differe
Just now, Justin Zamora wrote:
> The search still doesn't find words in function descriptions.
[It's not a full-text search, and as long as it's required to run on
client machines (needed to run on your local copy), it's unlikely to
become a full-text search.]
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (l
The search still doesn't find words in function descriptions. For
example, http://pre.racket-lang.org/docs/html/search/index.html?q=sine
returns no results. This is especially frustrating since the very
first exercise in HTDP 1e is to use the search to find out whether
DrRacket has a sine functi
An hour and a half ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > 20 minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> >> > That can currently get to ~20k things to sort and adjust for
> >> > additional
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Just now, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> >
>> > ** More about the change (especially if you want to try to improve
>> > things):
>> >
>> > This is not real ranking, but it should give b
2012/5/29 Eli Barzilay :
> I have made a possibly useful improvement to the JS search code.
> It's not pushed, yet, but I dropped the revised JS code on the
> pre-built pages so you can try it out here:
>
> http://pre.racket-lang.org/docs/html/search/
>
> and compare searches with the usual page:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 20 minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> > That can currently get to ~20k things to sort and adjust for
>> > additional entries that get added on each release, planet
>> > packages,
20 minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > That can currently get to ~20k things to sort and adjust for
> > additional entries that get added on each release, planet
> > packages, etc.
>
> Have you measured how long this takes? On my mach
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> That can currently get to ~20k things to sort and adjust for
> additional entries that get added on each release, planet packages,
> etc.
Have you measured how long this takes? On my machine, the `sort()`
method on an array of 25000 strings t
A few minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Eli Barzilay wrote at 05/29/2012 07:17 AM:
> > I have made a possibly useful improvement to the JS search code.
> > It's not pushed, yet, but I dropped the revised JS code on the
> > pre-built pages so you can try it out here:
> >
> >http://pre.racket-l
Eli Barzilay wrote at 05/29/2012 07:17 AM:
I have made a possibly useful improvement to the JS search code.
It's not pushed, yet, but I dropped the revised JS code on the
pre-built pages so you can try it out here:
http://pre.racket-lang.org/docs/html/search/
[...]
Eli, looks like a not
Just now, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> >
> > ** More about the change (especially if you want to try to improve
> > things):
> >
> > This is not real ranking, but it should give better results overall.
> > The thing is that the search assign
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> ** More about the change (especially if you want to try to improve
> things):
>
> This is not real ranking, but it should give better results overall.
> The thing is that the search assigns a small integer "score" for each
> term, where th
26 matches
Mail list logo
