Re: Review Request 59908: DB based auditing had been removed in RANGER-900. But some configurations and codes are not removed accordingly in Ranger Admin. It often makes the user feel confused such as

2017-06-09 Thread Qiang Zhang
> On June 8, 2017, 10:05 a.m., Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > "Currently it only support solr" - isn't hdfs supported as well here? > > Qiang Zhang wrote: > The Ranger Admin uses the configuration item to determine log should be > queried from db or solr. It only supported query logs from

Re: Review Request 59908: DB based auditing had been removed in RANGER-900. But some configurations and codes are not removed accordingly in Ranger Admin. It often makes the user feel confused such as

2017-06-09 Thread Qiang Zhang
> On 六月 8, 2017, 10:05 a.m., Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > "Currently it only support solr" - isn't hdfs supported as well here? The Ranger Admin uses the configuration item to determine log should be queried from db or solr. It only supported query logs from db or solr using Ranger Admin

Re: Review Request 59908: DB based auditing had been removed in RANGER-900. But some configurations and codes are not removed accordingly in Ranger Admin. It often makes the user feel confused such as

2017-06-08 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59908/#review177291 --- "Currently it only support solr" - isn't hdfs supported as well

Review Request 59908: DB based auditing had been removed in RANGER-900. But some configurations and codes are not removed accordingly in Ranger Admin. It often makes the user feel confused such as RAN

2017-06-08 Thread Qiang Zhang
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59908/ --- Review request for ranger, Alok Lal, Ankita Sinha, Don Bosco Durai, Colm O