---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62376/#review185795
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Colm O hEigeartaigh
On Sept. 19, 2017, 1
> On 九月 19, 2017, 11:43 a.m., Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> > I wonder if we need to support JAVA_HOME at all here in the solr audit
> > install.properties? Why not just take it from the environment like all of
> > the other plugins?
>
> pengjianhua wrote:
> The case will be very passive wh
> On Sept. 19, 2017, 11:43 a.m., Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> > I wonder if we need to support JAVA_HOME at all here in the solr audit
> > install.properties? Why not just take it from the environment like all of
> > the other plugins?
>
> pengjianhua wrote:
> The case will be very passive
> On 九月 19, 2017, 11:43 a.m., Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> > I wonder if we need to support JAVA_HOME at all here in the solr audit
> > install.properties? Why not just take it from the environment like all of
> > the other plugins?
>
> pengjianhua wrote:
> The case will be very passive wh
> On 九月 19, 2017, 11:43 a.m., Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> > I wonder if we need to support JAVA_HOME at all here in the solr audit
> > install.properties? Why not just take it from the environment like all of
> > the other plugins?
>
> pengjianhua wrote:
> The case will be very passive wh
> On Sept. 19, 2017, 11:43 a.m., Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> > I wonder if we need to support JAVA_HOME at all here in the solr audit
> > install.properties? Why not just take it from the environment like all of
> > the other plugins?
>
> pengjianhua wrote:
> The case will be very passive
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62376/
---
(Updated 九月 19, 2017, 12:45 p.m.)
Review request for ranger, Alok Lal, Ankita S
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62376/
---
(Updated 九月 19, 2017, 12:39 p.m.)
Review request for ranger, Alok Lal, Ankita S