+1, Excellent idea.
I was also thinking if we an add pages for some example on how to setup and use
ratis in applications.
Thanks,
Mukul
> On 18-Nov-2017, at 4:12 AM, Hugo Louro wrote:
>
> +1 - Great idea. I wonder if there are some templates around
> incubator/Apache projects that you can us
The rendered website looks great. +1 from me as well.
On 23/12/17, 1:34 AM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote:
+1, Great work. Let’s merge the awesome website.
On 12/22/17, 7:06 AM, "Elek, Marton" wrote:
Hi,
RATIS-5 feature branch contains the proposed site for
+1
-Mukul
On 16/01/18, 10:56 AM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote:
+1
On 1/15/18, 10:04 AM, "anu engineer" wrote:
+1
--Anu
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Marton, Elek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We got valuabl
Thanks for starting the discussion Marton.
Lets add RATIS-219 to the list as well. We should be good to create a new
release after that.
Thanks,
Mukul
On 06/04/18, 7:29 PM, "Elek, Marton" wrote:
Hi,
I would like to restart the discussion about a ratis release.
1. I
+1 as well. Tested the latest snapshot on Ozone. And Ozone is working perfectly
fine with the new version.
On 15/05/18, 8:34 PM, "Xiaoyu Yao" wrote:
+1 for 0.2.0.
Thanks
On 5/14/18, 4:29 PM, "Anu Engineer" wrote:
+1, on 0.2.0. The major consumer of Ratis (HD
Thanks for creating a new release Marton.
+1
Tested Ozone with latest ratis and ran data I/O operation using Freon.
Thanks,
Mukul
On 21/05/18, 8:18 PM, "Elek, Marton" wrote:
I extend the deadline of the vote. Kindly ask to check the package and
vote if you have time.
Thanks
Thanks for creating a new release Marton.
+1
Tested Ozone with latest ratis and ran data I/O operation using Freon.
Thanks,
Mukul
On 22/05/18, 7:22 AM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote:
Moving my vote to the right thread.
+1
Downloaded the source, verified signatures and ran some unit
Hi Josh,
Thanks for the proposal.
I feel (1) Will be a better option as there might be some changes in Ratis
needed for LogService.
Thanks,
Mukul
On 19/07/18, 6:48 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
Thanks, all. Nice to have positivity behind the proposal :) Let me see
if I can start creati
+1 (binding)
Build from source.
Verified LICENSE, NOTICE and README.
Thanks,
Mukul
On 12/3/18, 11:26 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote:
+1 (binding)
verified checksums, can build from source.
On 12/3/18, 9:46 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
Thanks for voting, Marton!
Looks good to me as well.
On 2/7/19, 1:48 AM, "Arpit Agarwal" wrote:
LGTM also.
- Original message -
From: Jitendra Pandey
To: Josh Elser , "dev@ratis.incubator.apache.org"
, Justin Mclean ,
Devaraj Das , Uma Maheswara Rao Gangumalla
, Jakob Homan
Cc: "priv.
+1,
On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote:
> I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3
branch).
+1
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal
wrote:
> +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
>
>
> > On Mar 20, 2019
Thanks for trying out filestore example Zhou Hai.
The following link helps in running the ratis filestore example.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis#filestore
Please let us know if you face any problems while running this example.
Thanks,
Mukul
On 3/30/19, 10:34 PM, "Hai Zhou" wrote:
+1
1. Verified the Checksums and Signature.
2. Built from sources.
3. Compiled Ozone with Ratis 0.3.0 rc2 dependency.
Thanks,
Mukul
On 4/11/19 8:18 PM, Elek, Marton wrote:
+1
1. Verified the Signature.
2. Verified the Checksums.
3. Built from Sources.
4. Compiled Ozone with the 0.3.0 rat
Hi Josh,
Following link points to the tweaks done in Ozone for Ratis Server
Please have a look at newRaftPropertiessetRatisLeaderElectionTimeout in
XceiverServerRatis.
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/d31c86892e0ceec5d642f76fc9123fac4fd80db8/hadoop-hdds/container-service/src/main/java/or
Hi,
It has been a while since our last Ratis release.
We have around 50 commits after our latest 0.3.0 release.
How about we start the process for a new Ratis release (0.4.0).
We can create a new 0.4.0 branch and change trunk to 0.5.0.
Thanks,
Mukul
ote on releasing this RC. Thank you in advance.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Starting with my +1.
Regards,
Mukul Kumar Singh
able at
https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ratis/KEYS
Thanks
Anu
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:52 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
wrote:
Hi Apache Ratis PPMC,
I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc0.
This is with respect to the discuss mail thread
<
https://lists.apache
or at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC. Thank you in advance.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Starting with my +1.
Regards,
Mukul Kumar Singh
ey is not present in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS
2. It would be good to sign the git tag.
On Jul 29, 2019, at 2:59 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh wrote:
Hi Apache Ratis PPMC,
I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc1.
This vote is after fixing i
/incubator/ratis/KEYS
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS>
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC. Thank you in advance.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Starting with my +1.
Rega
Hi Sammi,
The mailing list aliases to subscribe can be found here
https://ratis.incubator.apache.org/#community
Thanks,
Mukul
On 8/14/19 5:33 PM, Sammi Chen wrote:
t.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS>
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC. Thank you in advance.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Starting with my +1.
Built Ozone from source and was able to run the e
Thanks for looking into Ratis, Xiangdong.
Ratis has all the Raft features implemented, i.e Leader Election, Log
Replication and Membership Changes.
We have also done some performance improvement to make Ratis performant
to replicate large amounts of data along with the metadata.
There are n
1.
Built Ozone from source and was able to run the examples.
Regards,
Mukul Kumar Singh
s/KEYS
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC. Thank you in advance.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Starting with my +1.
Regards,
Mukul Kumar Singh
12, 2019, at 8:41 PM, Mukul Kumar Singh wrote:
Hi Apache Ratis PPMC,
I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc4.
This is with respect to the discuss mailthread
<https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/781fb6db8fe3327683f96b880496cf4b297f8666a2fab85c413c6f4b@%3Cdev.ratis.apa
approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Starting with my +1.
Regards,
Mukul Kumar Singh
Lets also get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-407 in for
0.5.0 as well.
Thanks,
Mukul
On 25/10/19 3:31 am, Jitendra Pandey wrote:
+1, we have made several fixes and improvements as well.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:58 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
Hi Ratis Dev,
As reported by Henrik He
0.4.0.
-Xiaoyu
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:04 AM Andy Wu wrote:
+1. Since 0.4.0 is not usable, a release of 0.5.0 asap will be greatly
appreciated. Let me know if I can help in any way.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:03 PM Mukul Kumar Singh <
mksingh.apa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Lets also get
Hi Ratis Dev,
With the discussion of Ratis 0.5.0 release in progress.
With Ratis-407 committed, a new thirdparty release is needed.
This thread discusses a new ratis-thirdparty release so that grpc and
protobuf and netty versions can be updated in Ratis.
Thanks,
Mukul
:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC. Thank you in advance.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Starting with my +1(binding).
Regards,
Mukul Kumar Singh
AM Andy Wu wrote:
+1. Since 0.4.0 is not usable, a release of 0.5.0 asap will be greatly
appreciated. Let me know if I can help in any way.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:03 PM Mukul Kumar Singh <
mksingh.apa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Lets also get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-407
Hey Xiaoyu,
As part of the earlier thread for 0.5.0, I had raised a concern for
update of grpc and protobuf version in Ratis.
That change is now merged into Ratis and we are good to roll out a new
release(0.5.0).
Thanks,
Mukul
On 09/12/19 11:27 pm, Xiaoyu Yao wrote:
@Mukul Kumar Singh
+1(binding)
-Built from source
- Validated Signatures
- Validated checksums.
Thanks,
Mukul
On 06/02/20 9:07 am, Dinesh Chitlangia wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
- Built from source
- verified signature
- verified arithmetic example
Thanks Xiaoyu for organizing this release.
Dinesh
On Wed, Fe
Hi,
With RATIS-847 and RATIS-852 fixed, I propose to create a new release
for Ratis Thirdparty.
I would like to get everyone's thoughts on this.
Thanks,
Mukul
wrote:
+1
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:57 AM Siddharth Wagle
wrote:
+1
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:22 AM Arpit Agarwal
wrote:
+1
On Apr 16, 2020, at 2:01 AM, Lokesh Jain
wrote:
+1
On 16-Apr-2020, at 2:21 PM, Mukul Kumar Singh <
mksingh.apa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
With RAT
e.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Starting with my +1(binding).
Regards,
Mukul Kumar Singh
Thanks for the validating the RC Josh, Arpit, Lokesh and Marton.
I will restart a new RC.
Thanks,
Mukul
On 22/04/20 2:30 pm, Elek, Marton wrote:
> The version in pom.xml of source tarball have SNAPSHOT in their name.
Yes, the source package seems to be created based on the previous
commit,
(and reason why)
Starting with my +1(binding).
Regards,
Mukul Kumar Singh
Thanks all for voting the release of Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.4.0. The 0.4.0
RC1 vote
has passed with
3 +1 binding votes
2 +1 non-binding vote
0 -1 votes.
+1 vote from
- Lokesh Jain (binding)
- Marton Elek (binding)
- Mukul Kumar Singh (binding)
- Hanish Koneru (non-binding
Hi IPMC,
Apache Ratis Thirdpardy 0.4.0-rc1 vote [1] is just passed on the PPMC
vote [2].
Apache Ratis is an embaddable Raft implementation but this release
artifact is only the packaging of some of the 3rd party dependencies.
The git tag to be voted upon:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?
Thanks all for voting for the release of Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.4.0.
The 0.4.0 vote passes with
3 +1 binding votes
2 +1 non-binding vote
0 -1 votes.
+1 vote from
- Uma Maheshwara Rao G (binding)
- Arpit Agarwal (binding)
- Jitendra Pandey (binding)
- Mukul Kumar Singh (non-binding
+1
Thanks,
Mukul
On 03/06/20 10:59 am, Lokesh Jain wrote:
Hi
With RATIS-933 fixed, I propose to create a new release for Ratis Thirdparty.
I would like to get everyone’s thoughts on this.
Thanks
Lokesh
Thanks for starting the discussion thread.
How about the next release of Ratis be a GA release?
Thanks,
Mukul
On 03/06/20 12:35 pm, Lokesh Jain wrote:
Hi,
It has been a while since our last Ratis release.
We have around 95 commits after our latest 0.5.0 release.
How about we start the proce
+1(binding)
1. Verified signatures and checksums.
2. Built from source.
Thanks,
Mukul
On 23/06/20 2:16 pm, Shashikant Banerjee wrote:
+1
1. Verified signatures and checksums.
2. Built from source.
3. Verified notice and license files.
Thanks Lokesh for putting up this release together.
Th
45 matches
Mail list logo