Re: [DISCUSS] version of next release (was Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc0))

+1 as well. Tested the latest snapshot on Ozone. And Ozone is working perfectly fine with the new version. On 15/05/18, 8:34 PM, "Xiaoyu Yao" wrote: +1 for 0.2.0. Thanks On 5/14/18, 4:29 PM, "Anu Engineer" wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] version of next release (was Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc0))

+1 for 0.2.0. Thanks On 5/14/18, 4:29 PM, "Anu Engineer" wrote: +1, on 0.2.0. The major consumer of Ratis (HDDS/Ozone) will take it with or without –alpha ( --Anu On 5/14/18, 2:24 PM, "Elek, Marton" wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] version of next release (was Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc0))

+1, on 0.2.0. The major consumer of Ratis (HDDS/Ozone) will take it with or without –alpha ( --Anu On 5/14/18, 2:24 PM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: All the issues are fixed now (Thanks Nanda, Tsz-Wo, Mukul) The only open question is the version of the release

[DISCUSS] version of next release (was Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc0))

All the issues are fixed now (Thanks Nanda, Tsz-Wo, Mukul) The only open question is the version of the release (alpha vs non-alpha). I think there are two kind of alpha releases: 1. Alpha as defined in the semantic versioning specification (https://semver.org/). Here the alpha is a