Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

2018-11-03 Thread Tsz Wo Sze
+1 - Verified the signature and checksums. - Checked LICENSE, NOTICE and NOTICE in the gz and the jar files - Checked file names -- all file in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.1.0-rc1/ have "incubating". Thanks a lot, Josh! Tsz-Wo On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:20 A

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

2018-11-05 Thread Ted Yu
+1 On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 10:51 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > +1 > > - Verified the signature and checksums. > - Checked LICENSE, NOTICE and NOTICE in the gz and the jar files > - Checked file names -- all file in > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.1.0-rc1/ > have "

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

2018-11-05 Thread Jitendra Pandey
+1, verified signatures, LICENSE and NOTICE files are present. NOTICE, and LICENSE files, however, do not include copyrights of dependencies. We should plan to address that, if required, in next release. On 11/5/18, 9:54 AM, "Ted Yu" wrote: +1 On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 10:51 PM Ts

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

2018-11-05 Thread Josh Elser
Thanks for the vote, Jitendra. As a part of this release, I did enumerate each dependency we include in the thirdparty-misc JAR and I believe we have the minimum-required L&N files already. There was one addition (which Marton found in rc0, IIRC) that we include proactively (via the files in [

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

2018-11-05 Thread Josh Elser
Realizing that even though I do not have a binding vote via PPMC, I do have a binding vote via my IPMC membership. Thus, changing my +1 from non-binding to binding :). Sorry for the confusion. On 10/31/18 2:20 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Hi, Please vote on the following release candidate to becom