James Grahn wrote:
but I'd
appreciate some clarification as to what that objection is. I don't
believe that any annotations or fancier tools will be necessary.
Are you suggesting type safety is NOT a necessary language feature in
distributed code?
By adding a Generic JavaSpace API to
I have to agree with Peter on this. It's easy to make a good enough
solution using generic, particularly if you're developing services within a
single safe environment. E.g. At your company where all services are
written by people on your team and hosted on a private company subnet.
But River
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Tom Hobbs tvho...@googlemail.com wrote:
The artifacts can be found here;
http://people.apache.org/~thobbs/river/
Hopefully I've done it all right, if not then please let me know and I
can get it fixed.
-1 The release package doesn't build:
$ tar
Thanks for the feedback, I'll try and get it sorted this evening (GMT).
On 2 Jun 2011 10:11, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Tom Hobbs tvho...@googlemail.com
wrote:
The artifacts can be found here;
http://people.apache.org/~thobbs/river/
Sorry for not being of much assistance recently, River is a tough
release, I'll make some time to help tomorrow. Tom has been battling on
his own here, keeping the ship on course. Don't worry, I had to throw
away my first release artifacts too. A sterling effort.
Cheers,
Peter.
Jukka
No worries, Peter. You've been keeping River afloat on your own plenty.
Can you remember how we generate the release notes out of Jira?
I'm not worried about the duff artifacts, this is what peer reviews are
for! A man who has never made a mistake, has never made anything.
On 2 Jun 2011
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tom Hobbs tvho...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can you remember how we generate the release notes out of Jira?
See the Release notes links in the Roadmap screen [1].
It would be good to make a specific version label for this release.
You should be able to do that
Cool, thanks. I'll make sure that gets done as well and then roll a new
release.
On 2 Jun 2011 10:49, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tom Hobbs tvho...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can you remember how we generate the release notes out of Jira?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310600version=12313450
We've also got to increment the release version, or at least check that
we have, in the source code, I'll have to dig it out of my notes.
In jira we close off any resolved issues and move any remaining
In that case, can I make a plea to all and sundry that if you've been
working on Jira issues and have finished them, then please make sure the
issues are closed.
Less work on my end, that way! ;-)
Cheers
On 2 Jun 2011 11:07, Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au wrote:
Are you suggesting type safety is NOT a necessary language feature in
distributed code?
Not at all.
However, type safety is not a feature which is the exclusive terrain
of the compiler. With the force of sufficient
On 2 June 2011 14:11, James Grahn grahn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au wrote:
Are you suggesting type safety is NOT a necessary language feature in
distributed code?
Not at all.
However, type safety is not a feature which is the
On 6/1/2011 11:38 PM, James Grahn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Peter Firmstonej...@zeus.net.au wrote:
Remember the compiler doesn't type check dynamic code conversion, only
static conversion. Dynamic happens at runtime. Services are dynamic,
discovered at runtime.
As I said, I
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Dan Creswell dan.cresw...@gmail.com wrote:
I recall one of the reasons for introducing generics was because force
of sufficient reasoning proved ineffective such that people would get
runtime casting problems when extracting objects from collections.
I find the
This makes total sense to me.
Shay
-Original Message-
From: Dan Creswell [mailto:dan.cresw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:58 AM
To: dev@river.apache.org
Subject: Re: correctness, generics, and spaces
On 2 June 2011 14:11, James Grahn grahn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun
James Grahn wrote:
What is the bigger picture you're concerned with?
Reliability, developers experiencing unexpected run time errors and
compatibility issues in deployed code when using Generics in Service API.
In our earlier discussions I provided an example of how generics can
remain
16 matches
Mail list logo
