Changing my vote to +0 for the moment.
OK, so what we have here is a build bug.
If you do an ‘ant clean’ then ‘ant river-runtime’, all is good.
Do ‘ant river-runtime’ again, you get the failure that Patricia is seeing.
If you ‘cd qa’ then do ‘ant run-categories’ the qa suite runs without error.
My feeling is that there should be some way to document that it is not a
real release, keep it as a development download for testing only, but
make more users aware of it on those terms.
Can we e.g. put "beta" in its name?
What do other people think?
On 3/4/2016 7:57 AM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
C
This bug also exists in previous releases, it was exposed with the inclusion of
the Groovy provider.
Sent from my Samsung device.
Include original message
Original message
From: Greg Trasuk
Sent: 05/03/2016 01:57:14 am
To: dev@river.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reminder: [Vote] Release
If you want to call it Beta, go for it, lets just get it released, even
with the build bug, it's not critical.
It won't take long for people to realise this Beta has a few hundred
less bugs than our previous releases, even if some newly introduced bugs
appear, it'll be easy to fix them quickly
