Yeah, this is not the right place for this rant.
But was curious what the River community thinks about it.
Michał
> On 30 Apr 2021, at 17:59, Jeremy R. Easton-Marks
> wrote:
>
> Hi Michal,
> I think you should definitely share your opinions about this (
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse
Hi Michal,
I think you should definitely share your opinions about this (
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8264713). I think they may not
know about Apache River and they probably should address the issues around
dynamically loaded code. I would cite other Java examples other than just
Rive
> On 30 Apr 2021, at 04:42, Jeremy R. Easton-Marks
> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how much JEP 411 will impact River. I agree with the overall
> direction that it proposes in removing the security manager.
IMHO JEP 411 gives unconvincing reasons to ditch SecurityManager:
- brittle permission mode
