For what it's worth the new Raspberry Pi 2 came out last week. It has 4
cores and is said to be 6x faster than the previous version. For 35 USD
it's a pretty compelling product.
-j
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
>
> I have a Raspberry Pi but haven’t tried running River on i
No, services shouldn't be required to use this standard but the
River-provided services should model it as the best practice, as mentioned
in another thread.
-j
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote:
>
> >
> > On Feb 19, 2014,
I'm also a big fan of Rio and its multi-module service build structure and
the use of Maven for code distribution. Any decision to select an
alternative container as a de facto standard would be ill-advised, in my
opinion. Not to say Rio has to be the standard, but if it's not it should
be of equal
Somehow I didn't get Greg's message earlier--just seeing the full text now.
I think the multiple modules resulting in multiple Eclipse projects (for
instance) is a huge strength. Each artifact then has its own classpath and
significantly reduces the possibility of compilation or runtime errors.
Su
I agree with Dennis--modern dependency management is way more elegant and
less error-prone than classdepandjar.
-j
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Feb 11, 2014, at 8:22 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
> >
> >
> > Those recommendations are more app
ow and policy first, then choose tools. I also get
> nervous about big changes.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Greg.
>
> On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 00:51, Jeff Ramsdale wrote:
> > I sorta got shot down a little while ago for suggesting git be
> considered,
> > but that's ex
I sorta got shot down a little while ago for suggesting git be considered,
but that's exactly the way branches and pull requests in git are handled. I
understand it can be done with other scms, it's just easier with git.
Non-bindingly, I agree with you.
-j
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Greg T
At the risk of de-railing the conversation, is there an option to move to
git for Apache Foundation projects such as River? I was long a big
proponent of SVN but I'm now thoroughly converted and can't help but think
this situation wouldn't have occurred if git were in use. (Yes, it's
possible to do
Hi Dennis,
I'm excited to see your activity in getting a new River release and getting
the artifacts posted to Maven Central. In connection to that would you
consider moving Rio's own artifacts to the Sonatype OSS repo so they are
automatically synced to Maven Central? More info here:
https://docs
Maven archetypes are the way to go. IDE agnostic and all IDEs support
Maven. Dennis Reedy with Rio has done a lot of work with Maven and
Jini services, using multi-module projects to write services, keeping
interface, proxy, service, and UI classpaths distinct and managing
dependencies, etc. It's a
I'm on Mac, and I like clicking on files, for what it's worth. Even
more than in the file explorer it helps in an IDE to have editors
associated with file extensions. For commandline folks there's tab
completion. Are extensions really so heinous?
-jeff
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Gregg Wonde
Great news! Thanks for staying on top of that.
-jeff
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
> Some good news:
>
> Oracle recently failed to renew the jini.net domain name, it became
> available for back order on namejet. Patricia, Tom and myself combined our
> resources and man
Luis,
My opinion is there should be a prominent message on the site pointing
to Apache River (and then lock it down). I know I've talked to some
folks who don't recognize the good going on here because of the
indirection. I would be in favor of reconstituting the site in the
future if there can be
13 matches
Mail list logo
