In a word, no because the classes use standard java bytecode and methods.
Standard serializable lambda's are brittle, any change in the
encapsulating class can cause breakage during deserialization.
What I'm looking at doing for lambda's that don't refer to their
enclosing classes object meth
How stable is the lamba translation? If this changes or is different for
different JVMs, will that break things?
Bryan
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Peter wrote:
> So far, a subset of Lambda's appear very suitable for marshalling
> remotely, where their code can execute in a remote jvm.
>
>
So far, a subset of Lambda's appear very suitable for marshalling remotely,
where their code can execute in a remote jvm.
A lambda, that doesn't refer to object methods in its enclosing class, results
in the java compiller creating a static method that accepts captured object
arguments, contain
