Re: River's Future

2016-10-12 Thread Peter
apache.org Subject: Re: River's Future My apologies, try this. https://www.contrastsecurity.com/security-influencers/java-deserializing-open-source-tool Sent from my Samsung device.     Include original message  Original message  From: "Michał Kłeczek (XPro Sp. z o. o.)" 

Re: River's Future

2016-10-11 Thread Peter
apache.org Subject: Re: River's Future This is interesting but the link is broken. Michal Peter October 11, 2016 at 10:02 AM  I'd like to donate atomic input validation for Java serialization to River. At least one security researcher has provided some initial positive feedback.

Re: River's Future

2016-10-11 Thread Michał Kłeczek (XPro Sp. z o. o.)
This is interesting but the link is broken. Michal Peter October 11, 2016 at 10:02 AM I'd like to donate atomic input validation for Java serialization to River. At least one security researcher has provided some initial positive feedback. See the comments at th

River's Future

2016-10-11 Thread Peter
 I'd like to donate atomic input validation for Java serialization to River. At least one security researcher has provided some initial positive feedback. See the comments at the end of this article. https://contrastsecurity.com/security-influencers/java-deserializing-open-source-tool Regards,

Re: Discuss River's future

2016-04-16 Thread Tom Hobbs
+1 what Bryan said, with one exception; s/IoT/Service Discovery/ But we all have our own itches to scratch and a more modular project setup would help everyone. Tom > On 16 Apr 2016, at 11:35, Bryan Thompson wrote: > > I would like to see the 3.0 release go forward followed by something like

Re: Discuss River's future

2016-04-16 Thread Bryan Thompson
I would like to see the 3.0 release go forward followed by something like 2. Breaking down the project into a more modular form and focusing on updated use cases, especially IoT. Bryan On Saturday, April 16, 2016, Peter wrote: > What do you want for River? > > 1. Care & Maintenance of 2.2 branch

Discuss River's future

2016-04-15 Thread Peter
What do you want for River? 1. Care & Maintenance of 2.2 branch, until retirement? 2. Attempt to reinvigorate the project with something new?  Eg: minimalist modular project, not necessarily backward compatible.   + care & maintenance of 2.2 branch? 3. Attic? 4. Attempt to continue project using