On 15-01-12 12:52, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 15-01-12 09:55, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
Shall we adapt our compatibility policy?
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
Gr. Sim
+1
Might as well, we don't have the resources at present to support
Probably a vote.
Sorry for not mentioning this before, I'm snowed under...again.
I remember last time this came up we elected to keep support for Java 5
because we had a user who was dependent on it because of their use of Real
Time Java. Does anyone remember that or did I make it up? My
In any case, I suggest posting the proposal to the user list and getting
reactions before voting.
Patricia
On 1/18/2012 1:50 AM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
Probably a vote.
Sorry for not mentioning this before, I'm snowed under...again.
I remember last time this came up we elected to keep support
On 18-01-12 12:02, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
In any case, I suggest posting the proposal to the user list and getting
reactions before voting.
Do you mean to say that we will stay on jdk5 when a user says no?
Gr. Sim
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality
On 1/18/2012 7:28 AM, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 18-01-12 12:02, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
In any case, I suggest posting the proposal to the user list and getting
reactions before voting.
Do you mean to say that we will stay on jdk5 when a user says no?
Personally, I would vote +1 if only
No, I'm suggesting being sensitive to the needs of our users and make an
informed decision when we've made a reasonable effort to understand
everyone's position.
Sent via mobile device, please forgive typos and spacing errors.
On 18 Jan 2012 15:29, Simon IJskes - QCG si...@qcg.nl wrote:
On
On 18-01-12 16:40, Tom Hobbs wrote:
No, I'm suggesting being sensitive to the needs of our users and make an
informed decision when we've made a reasonable effort to understand
everyone's position.
Ok, be my guest. I'm not going to do this.
Gr. Sim
Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
Shall we adapt our compatibility policy?
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
Gr. Sim
+1
Might as well, we don't have the resources at present to support Java 5
properly and we can't compile the build on it due to dependencies and
aren't testing
On 15-01-12 09:55, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
Shall we adapt our compatibility policy?
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
Gr. Sim
+1
Might as well, we don't have the resources at present to support Java 5
Also some of my concurrency work
