Re: [GSoC][ROCKETMQ-377] Implement a openwhisk-package-rocketmq to support serverless function

Hi, I looked through your proposal, that's exactly what the issue needed, let's move forward it. Regards, yukon On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:48 AM, mayar.abdelaziz1...@gmail.com < mayar.abdelaziz1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Yukon and Von, > > I have investigated the issue well and prepared a

Re: [GSOC2018][ROCKETMQ-379] Support AMQP protocol for RocketMQ-Proposal

Hi yukon, Von, I have uploaded the final proposal in PDF format via GSOC application dashboard. I'm eagerly waiting to work with you. Thank you. Best regards, R.Kasthuriraajan. On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Ratnasingam Kasthuriraajan < kasthuriraaja...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you so

[GitHub] aluomaidi opened a new issue #253: Supports internal and external network separation Settings

aluomaidi opened a new issue #253: Supports internal and external network separation Settings URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/253 Let's start with the background. Now we're doing a message queuing service, and the underlying platform is based on k8s or openstack. I looked

[GitHub] vongosling closed issue #237: Spinlock bad performance with high race conditions.

vongosling closed issue #237: Spinlock bad performance with high race conditions. URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/237 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] vongosling commented on issue #237: Spinlock bad performance with high race conditions.

vongosling commented on issue #237: Spinlock bad performance with high race conditions. URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/237#issuecomment-376090788 close this issue, welcome to provide issue description next time.

[GitHub] vongosling commented on issue #237: Spinlock bad performance with high race conditions.

vongosling commented on issue #237: Spinlock bad performance with high race conditions. URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/237#issuecomment-376090446 @pifuant I have not seen your correct description in your question, could you please provide your question as our instruction

[GitHub] vongosling commented on issue #251: cant start broker.sh

vongosling commented on issue #251: cant start broker.sh URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/251#issuecomment-376090026 This is not an issue, if you have any question, please ask the question in the user email list. http://rocketmq.apache.org/about/contact/

[GitHub] vongosling commented on issue #252: 为什么发送线程池默认只启动一个工作线程

vongosling commented on issue #252: 为什么发送线程池默认只启动一个工作线程 URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/252#issuecomment-376089920 This is not an issue, if you have any question, please ask the question in the user email list.http://rocketmq.apache.org/about/contact/

[GitHub] vongosling closed issue #248: rocketMq will support master/slave switch when master is broke down in fuature version

vongosling closed issue #248: rocketMq will support master/slave switch when master is broke down in fuature version URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/248 This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] vongosling commented on issue #248: rocketMq will support master/slave switch when master is broke down in fuature version

vongosling commented on issue #248: rocketMq will support master/slave switch when master is broke down in fuature version URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/248#issuecomment-376089330 we will create another solution for HA. BTW, please ask the question as our template

[GitHub] hanmz opened a new issue #252: 为什么发送线程池默认只启动一个工作线程

hanmz opened a new issue #252: 为什么发送线程池默认只启动一个工作线程 URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/252 thread numbers for send message thread pool, since spin lock will be used by default since 4.0.x, the default value is 1. 多起一些线程可以提高broker的接收消息的能力。但是，这里默认只启动了一个工作线程，是为了保证生产端消息的有序吗？

[GitHub] vongosling commented on issue #250: support dotnet(c#) client?

vongosling commented on issue #250: support dotnet(c#) client? URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/250#issuecomment-376088397 no support now, please raise the issue as our question template. This is an automated