coveralls edited a comment on issue #519: [ISSUE#403]Implement the acl
strandard for rocketmq
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/519#issuecomment-435334578
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/19977923/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/19977923)
Coverage
+1
+1
At 2018-11-07 13:04:09, "heng du" wrote:
>Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>This is the vote for 4.3.2 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
>This release enhanced some of original features and fixed some bugs,
>further improved the stability of RocketMQ.
>
>
>The artifacts:
ymwneu commented on issue #531: can't get code and errorMsg in
SendMessageContext when running SendMessageProcessor.executeSendMessageHookAfter
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/531#issuecomment-436886309
My mistake, i am not sure SendMessageHook will be deprecated.
I think
ymwneu commented on issue #531: can't get code and errorMsg in
SendMessageContext when running SendMessageProcessor.executeSendMessageHookAfter
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/531#issuecomment-436885679
I have seen your PR, i think it will cause a response send twice.
lemonzone2010 edited a comment on issue #531: can't get code and errorMsg in
SendMessageContext when running SendMessageProcessor.executeSendMessageHookAfter
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/531#issuecomment-436883706
@ymwneu
- The method doResponse doesn't affect the
lemonzone2010 commented on issue #531: can't get code and errorMsg in
SendMessageContext when running SendMessageProcessor.executeSendMessageHookAfter
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/531#issuecomment-436883706
> I checked the code, found
> `if (sendOK) {`
> ` //xx`
ymwneu edited a comment on issue #531: can't get code and errorMsg in
SendMessageContext when running SendMessageProcessor.executeSendMessageHookAfter
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/531#issuecomment-436878483
I checked the code, found
`if (sendOK) {`
`
ymwneu commented on issue #531: can't get code and errorMsg in
SendMessageContext when running SendMessageProcessor.executeSendMessageHookAfter
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/531#issuecomment-436878483
I checked the code, found
`if (sendOK) {
//xx
vongosling commented on issue #534: Two instance consumers in the same machine
will both consume message in the mode of CLUSTERING.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/534#issuecomment-436863137
If you could be careful of the code of the RocketMQ parts - how to create a
zhangdp-taozi commented on issue #534: Two instance consumers in the same
machine will both consume message in the mode of CLUSTERING.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/534#issuecomment-436860894
but If I open vpn, the two instance consumers have different customerid, how
coveralls edited a comment on issue #532: ISSUE530
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/532#issuecomment-436565038
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/19975442/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/19975442)
Coverage decreased (-0.04%) to 43.17% when pulling
lemonzone2010 commented on issue #531: can't get code and errorMsg in
SendMessageContext when running SendMessageProcessor.executeSendMessageHookAfter
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/531#issuecomment-436859508
[PR #533 ](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/533)
coveralls edited a comment on issue #532: ISSUE530
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/532#issuecomment-436565038
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/19974955/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/19974955)
Coverage decreased (-0.08%) to 43.126% when pulling
vongosling closed issue #534: Two instance consumers in the same machine will
both consume message in the mode of CLUSTERING.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/534
This is an automated message from the Apache
vongosling commented on issue #534: Two instance consumers in the same machine
will both consume message in the mode of CLUSTERING.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/534#issuecomment-436848708
This is normal behavior if you use the same consumer id @zhangdp-taozi
please
vongosling commented on issue #528: QuickStart Document needs to add Min Disc
Space Prerequisite
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/528#issuecomment-436847627
@walking98 Thanks for your suggestion,Prerequisite need to be elaborate for
a user to quick start.
vongosling closed issue #405: Master power off may cause consumeQueue diff from
commitLog
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/405
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
vongosling commented on issue #507: 4.1.0-incubating rocket-client
rocketmq_client.log can't be delete in otherdsays
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/507#issuecomment-436844632
@superheizai any followup?
This
zhangdp-taozi opened a new issue #534: Two instance consumers in the same
machine will both consume message in the mode of CLUSTERING.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/534
There is a consumer in my application, I start this application twice with
different ports, then there
coveralls commented on issue #532: ISSUE530
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/532#issuecomment-436565038
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/19955504/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/19955504)
Coverage decreased (-0.09%) to 43.116% when pulling
+1
there is still some polish works todo in the download page. Lack of
compatibility description and too messy download links.
Von Gosling
> 在 2018年11月7日,下午1:04,heng du 写道:
>
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 4.3.2 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
> This release enhanced some of
+1 congratulation
Sent from my Huawei Mobile
Original Message
Subject: 回复:[VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.3.2 RC1
From: 李维军
To: dev
CC:
+1 Congratulations!
--
发件人:heng du
发送时间:2018年11月7日(星期三) 13:04
收件人:dev
主
lemonzone2010 opened a new pull request #533: [ISSUE#531]return response in
handlePutMessageResult
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/533
## What is the purpose of the change
[Related issue#531](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/531)
## Brief changelog
+1 Congratulations!
--
发件人:heng du
发送时间:2018年11月7日(星期三) 13:04
收件人:dev
主 题:[VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.3.2 RC1
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for 4.3.2 of Apache RocketMQ.
This release enhanced some of original
+1 make it perfect!
> 在 2018年11月7日,下午4:40,yukon 写道:
>
> +1 binding
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:37 PM 魏欢 wrote:
>
>> +1
>> glad to hear the new release!
>>
>>
>> -- Original --
>> From: "dongeforever";
>> Date: Wed, Nov 7, 2018 01:26 PM
>> To: "dev";
>>
coveralls edited a comment on issue #519: [ISSUE#403]Implement the acl
strandard for rocketmq
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/519#issuecomment-435334578
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/19954684/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/19954684)
Coverage
+1 binding
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:37 PM 魏欢 wrote:
> +1
> glad to hear the new release!
>
>
> -- Original --
> From: "dongeforever";
> Date: Wed, Nov 7, 2018 01:26 PM
> To: "dev";
>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.3.2 RC1
>
>
> +1 binding
>
Black-Mamba24 commented on issue #530: Admin Command issues
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/530#issuecomment-436547239
@ymwneu you are right, my version is 4.2.0
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
Black-Mamba24 opened a new pull request #532: ISSUE530
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/532
## What is the purpose of the change
X
## Brief changelog
XX
## Verifying this change
Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your
30 matches
Mail list logo