+1 I've checked:
[OK] check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
[OK] check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if necessary
[OK] extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
[OK] verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
在 2024-06-13 17:07:20，"沈林" <2011shen...@gmail.com>
+1
在 2023-07-21 09:35:14，"fan wang" 写道：
>+1
>
>The link to the proposal is followed by an additional "" suffix, by
>the way.
>
>jinrongtong 于2023年7月20日周四 16:18写道：
>
>> +1
>> At 2023-07-20 16:15:30, "Qingshan Lin" wrote:
>> >+1
>> >
>> >On 2023/07/20 02:24:42 闽 wrote:
>> >> Hi, RocketMQ
+1 (Non-binding)
I checked:
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the
+1
在 2023-03-07 14:55:05，"2017赵科" <464473...@qq.com.INVALID> 写道：
>Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>
>
>As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP[RIP-62] Cold read
>control to support this feature. Now thei...@foxmail.com
>is willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to
+1 （Non-binding）
I checked:
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package.
[OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
+1. I checked:
[Y] run check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
[Y] extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
[Y] verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
[Y] build the source successfully
在 2023-01-06 14:57:13，"fuyou" 写道：
>+1
>
>nize 于2023年1月6日周五 14:09写道：
>
>> This is the
+1
在 2022-12-05 19:37:51，"hzh0425" 写道：
>+1
>
>
>
>| |
>hzh...@163.com
>|
>|
>邮箱：hzh...@163.com
>|
>
>
>
>
> 回复的原邮件
>| 发件人 | nize |
>| 日期 | 2022年12月05日 17:40 |
>| 收件人 | dev@rocketmq.apache.org |
>| 抄送至 | |
>| 主题 | [VOTE][RIP-58]RocketMQ Streams improvement |
>Hi, RocketMQ Community,
+1, it helps improve product quality of RocketMQ
--
Gaoyang Cai
在 2022-05-05 10:51:12，"heng du" 写道：
>+1
>
>YuanchenZhang 于2022年5月5日周四 10:46写道：
>
>> Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>>
>>
>>
>> As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to support
>> rocketmq e2e test and github
+1
在 2022-04-15 10:26:45，"heng du" 写道：
>+1
>
>孙先生 于2022年4月15日周五 10:23写道：
>
>> Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly
>> deploy Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are
>> willing to support the RIP,
+1
I checked:
[ok] The checksum for release package is correct.
[ok] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[ok] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[ok] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
[ok] The code can be built
+1
I checked:
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK] Build the source, start nameserver and broker according to the
+1
在 2022-02-08 17:37:26，"dongeforever" 写道：
>+1
>
>Rongtong Jin 于2022年2月8日周二 17:35写道：
>
>> +1
>>
>> 倪泽 uncleran...@gmail.com写道：
>> > +1
>> >
>> > zhibo li 于2022年2月8日周二 17:10写道：
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > heng du 于2022年2月8日周二 16:40写道：
>> > >
>> > > > Dear community,
>> > > >
>> > > > This is
Hi, RocketMQ Community,
As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to improve ease of
use for RocketMQ Client. Now the shepherds @duhenglucky is willing to support
the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread to enter the voting
process.
The vote will be open for
As rocketmq-logappender only provides appenders to log to RocketMQ, but
RocketMQ itself doesn't depend on it, I think it would be more appropriate to
put it in rocketmq-externals.
在 2021-12-16 22:18:04，"heng du" 写道：
>Dear community,
>
>Today I would like to kickstart a series of discussions
RIP-25 Ease of Use Improvements on RocketMQ Client API
* Current Status: Draft
* Authors: caigy https://github.com/caigy
* Shepherds: duhengforever duhengfore...@apache.org
* Mailing List discussion: dev@rocketmq.apache.org
* Pull Request: #PR_NUMBER
* Released:
Background
Congrats!
在 2021-09-24 14:48:38，"dongeforever" 写道：
>welcome!
>
>周波 于2021年9月24日周五 下午12:55写道：
>
>> Congrats!
>>
>> 倪泽 于2021年9月24日周五 下午12:36写道：
>>
>> > Congrats !
>> >
>> > Rongtong Jin 于2021年9月24日周五 上午11:42写道：
>> >
>> > > Congrats!
>> > >
>> > > Amber Liu ltambe...@gmail.com写道：
>> > > >
+1
[ok] check artifacts has correct names and release version.
[ok] Git tag page has correct release version for rocketmq version, and
source code zip package.
[ok] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
[ok]All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
Congrats!
At 2021-08-30 10:57:08, "heng du" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache RocketMQ has invited
>Xiaofeng Jiang to become a committer and we are pleased
>to announce that he has accepted.
>
>Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since
Congrats!
At 2021-08-30 10:58:37, "heng du" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache RocketMQ has invited
>Jidi Zhang to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has
>accepted.
>
>Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there
I vote +1 (non-binding)
I checked the following:
- Licence by Apache RAT
- Hashes of binary and source files are correct
- Signatures of binary and source files are correct
- Source code can be built successfully and all unit tests are passed locally
- Nameserver and Broker can be run
20 matches
Mail list logo
